The Daewoo Korando (KJ) 3.2, produced between 1999 and 2001, represented a significant step for the South Korean automaker into the competitive mid-size SUV market. Positioned as a rugged, body-on-frame vehicle, the KJ Korando aimed to offer a blend of off-road capability and on-road comfort, primarily targeting buyers in South Korea and select export markets. It was built upon a ladder frame chassis, a design choice common for SUVs of the era prioritizing durability and towing capacity. The 3.2-liter variant was the top-of-the-line offering, providing the most power and torque within the Korando KJ range, and was intended to appeal to those needing a capable and relatively well-equipped SUV.
Technical Specifications
| Brand | Daewoo |
| Model | Korando |
| Generation | Korando (KJ) |
| Type (Engine) | 3.2 (209 Hp) |
| Start of production | 1999 |
| End of production | 2001 |
| Powertrain Architecture | Internal Combustion engine |
| Body type | SUV |
| Seats | 5 |
| Doors | 3 |
| Fuel consumption (urban) | 16.8 l/100 km (14 US mpg, 16.8 UK mpg) |
| Fuel consumption (extra urban) | 10.1 l/100 km (23.3 US mpg, 28 UK mpg) |
| Fuel Type | Petrol (Gasoline) |
| Acceleration 0 – 100 km/h | 10.2 sec |
| Acceleration 0 – 62 mph | 10.2 sec |
| Acceleration 0 – 60 mph | 9.7 sec |
| Maximum speed | 176 km/h (109.36 mph) |
| Weight-to-power ratio | 8.7 kg/Hp |
| Weight-to-torque ratio | 6.1 kg/Nm |
| Power | 209 Hp @ 5700 rpm |
| Power per litre | 65.3 Hp/l |
| Torque | 297 Nm @ 4700 rpm (219.06 lb.-ft. @ 4700 rpm) |
| Engine layout | Front, Longitudinal |
| Engine displacement | 3199 cm3 (195.21 cu. in.) |
| Number of cylinders | 6 |
| Engine configuration | Inline |
| Cylinder Bore | 89.9 mm (3.54 in.) |
| Piston Stroke | 84 mm (3.31 in.) |
| Compression ratio | 10:1 |
| Number of valves per cylinder | 4 |
| Fuel injection system | Multi-port manifold injection |
| Engine aspiration | Naturally aspirated engine |
| Engine oil capacity | 6.7 l (7.08 US qt | 5.9 UK qt) |
| Kerb Weight | 1815 kg (4001.39 lbs.) |
| Max. weight | 2515 kg (5544.63 lbs.) |
| Max load | 700 kg (1543.24 lbs.) |
| Trunk (boot) space – minimum | 350 l (12.36 cu. ft.) |
| Trunk (boot) space – maximum | 1200 l (42.38 cu. ft.) |
| Fuel tank capacity | 70 l (18.49 US gal | 15.4 UK gal) |
| Length | 4260 mm (167.72 in.) |
| Width | 1841 mm (72.48 in.) |
| Height | 1840 mm (72.44 in.) |
| Wheelbase | 2480 mm (97.64 in.) |
| Front track | 1510 mm (59.45 in.) |
| Rear (Back) track | 1520 mm (59.84 in.) |
| Drive wheel | All wheel drive (4×4) |
| Number of gears and type of gearbox | 5 gears, manual transmission |
| Front suspension | Coil spring |
| Rear suspension | Coil spring |
| Front brakes | Disc |
| Rear brakes | Disc |
| Assisting systems | ABS (Anti-lock braking system) |
| Power steering | Hydraulic Steering |
| Tires size | 255/70 R15 |
| Wheel rims size | 15 |
Powertrain & Engine Architecture
The heart of the Korando 3.2 was Daewoo’s 3.2-liter inline-six cylinder engine. This engine, internally designated with various codes depending on the specific market, was a naturally aspirated powerplant featuring multi-port fuel injection. The engine’s design prioritized smooth power delivery over outright performance, reflecting the SUV’s intended use as a comfortable and capable family vehicle. The 10:1 compression ratio was a typical value for gasoline engines of the period. The engine’s longitudinal mounting allowed for a traditional front-engine, rear-wheel-drive layout with a transfer case for engaging the four-wheel-drive system. The five-speed manual transmission was the only gearbox option available with this engine, providing a direct connection between the engine and the drivetrain. The transmission was chosen for its durability and ability to handle the engine’s torque output.
Driving Characteristics
The Korando 3.2, with its 209 horsepower and 219 lb-ft of torque, offered respectable performance for its time. Acceleration from 0-60 mph took approximately 9.7 seconds, and it could reach a top speed of 109 mph. While not a sports SUV, the 3.2-liter engine provided sufficient power for highway cruising and tackling moderate off-road terrain. The manual transmission allowed for driver control, but the gear ratios were tuned for fuel efficiency and everyday usability rather than aggressive acceleration. Compared to lower-powered Korando variants, the 3.2 offered a noticeably more relaxed driving experience, particularly when fully loaded or towing. The 4×4 system provided enhanced traction in slippery conditions, making it a capable all-weather vehicle.
Equipment & Trim Levels
The Korando 3.2 typically came with a fairly comprehensive list of standard features, though specific equipment levels varied depending on the market. Generally, it included power windows and locks, air conditioning, and a basic audio system. Higher trim levels added features like alloy wheels, upgraded interior upholstery (often cloth or vinyl), and a sunroof. Optional extras could include a more advanced audio system, leather seats, and a rear cargo cover. The interior design was functional and utilitarian, prioritizing durability and ease of use over luxury. The dashboard layout was straightforward, with clearly labeled controls.
Chassis & Braking
The Korando KJ utilized a traditional body-on-frame construction, providing a robust and durable chassis. The suspension consisted of coil springs at all four corners, offering a comfortable ride quality. Front and rear disc brakes provided adequate stopping power, and an Anti-lock Braking System (ABS) was standard equipment, enhancing safety. The steering was hydraulically assisted, making it relatively easy to maneuver. The track width was moderate, contributing to stability on paved roads. The rear suspension design was a solid axle, typical for body-on-frame SUVs, prioritizing load-carrying capacity and off-road articulation.
Market Reception & Comparison
The Daewoo Korando 3.2 received mixed reviews from automotive critics. While praised for its ruggedness, spacious interior, and capable 4×4 system, it was often criticized for its somewhat dated design and less refined driving experience compared to newer, car-based SUVs. Fuel economy was also a concern, with the 3.2-liter engine consuming a significant amount of gasoline. Compared to other SUVs in its class, such as the Jeep Cherokee or the Toyota RAV4, the Korando offered a more affordable price point but lacked the same level of sophistication. The 3.2-liter engine was a significant upgrade over the smaller engine options, providing a noticeable improvement in performance and towing capacity.
Legacy
The Daewoo Korando KJ, while not a massive sales success, played a role in establishing Daewoo as a player in the SUV market. The 3.2-liter engine proved to be relatively reliable, although maintenance costs could be higher due to its larger displacement and inline-six configuration. Today, the Korando KJ 3.2 is a relatively rare vehicle, particularly in North America. Well-maintained examples are sought after by enthusiasts and collectors, and parts availability can be a challenge. The Korando KJ represents a unique chapter in automotive history, showcasing Daewoo’s ambition to compete in the global SUV market.
