The Daewoo Musso (FJ) 3.2 24V Automatic, produced from 1995 to 2002, represented a significant step for the South Korean automaker into the mid-size SUV market. Positioned as a more premium offering within the Musso range, the 3.2-liter variant aimed to provide a blend of capability, comfort, and performance. The Musso, named after the Korean word for rhinoceros, was intended to appeal to buyers seeking a robust and spacious vehicle for both on and off-road use. It was primarily marketed in Europe, Australia, and parts of Asia, with limited presence in the North American market. The FJ series, the first generation Musso, utilized a body-on-frame construction, a design choice common for SUVs of that era prioritizing durability and towing capacity.
Technical Specifications
| Brand | Daewoo |
| Model | Musso |
| Generation | Musso (FJ) |
| Type (Engine) | 3.2 24V (220 Hp) Automatic |
| Start of production | 1995 |
| End of production | 2002 |
| Powertrain Architecture | Internal Combustion engine |
| Body type | SUV |
| Seats | 5 |
| Doors | 5 |
| Fuel consumption (urban) | 17.8 l/100 km (13.2 US mpg) |
| Fuel consumption (extra urban) | 12.4 l/100 km (19 US mpg) |
| Fuel Type | Petrol (Gasoline) |
| Acceleration 0 – 100 km/h | 12.4 sec |
| Acceleration 0 – 62 mph | 12.4 sec |
| Acceleration 0 – 60 mph | 11.8 sec |
| Maximum speed | 190 km/h (118.06 mph) |
| Weight-to-power ratio | 8.8 kg/Hp |
| Weight-to-torque ratio | 6.3 kg/Nm |
| Power | 220 Hp @ 5750 rpm |
| Torque | 307 Nm @ 4000 rpm (226.43 lb.-ft. @ 4000 rpm) |
| Engine layout | Front, Longitudinal |
| Engine displacement | 3199 cm3 (195.21 cu. in.) |
| Number of cylinders | 6 |
| Engine configuration | Inline |
| Cylinder Bore | 89.9 mm (3.54 in.) |
| Piston Stroke | 84 mm (3.31 in.) |
| Compression ratio | 10:1 |
| Number of valves per cylinder | 4 |
| Fuel injection system | Multi-port manifold injection |
| Engine aspiration | Naturally aspirated engine |
| Engine oil capacity | 6.7 l (7.08 US qt | 5.9 UK qt) |
| Coolant capacity | 11 l (11.62 US qt | 9.68 UK qt) |
| Kerb Weight | 1935 kg (4265.94 lbs.) |
| Max. weight | 2520 kg (5555.65 lbs.) |
| Max load | 585 kg (1289.7 lbs.) |
| Trunk (boot) space – minimum | 780 l (27.55 cu. ft.) |
| Trunk (boot) space – maximum | 1910 l (67.45 cu. ft.) |
| Fuel tank capacity | 80 l (21.13 US gal | 17.6 UK gal) |
| Length | 4640 mm (182.68 in.) |
| Width | 1864 mm (73.39 in.) |
| Height | 1735 mm (68.31 in.) |
| Wheelbase | 2630 mm (103.54 in.) |
| Front track | 1510 mm (59.45 in.) |
| Rear (Back) track | 1520 mm (59.84 in.) |
| Drive wheel | All wheel drive (4×4) |
| Number of gears | 4 |
| Gearbox type | automatic transmission |
| Front suspension | Coil spring |
| Rear suspension | Coil spring |
| Front brakes | Disc |
| Rear brakes | Disc |
| Assisting systems | ABS (Anti-lock braking system) |
| Power steering | Hydraulic Steering |
| Tires size | 255/70 R15 |
Powertrain & Engine Architecture
The heart of the Musso 3.2 was the 6G72 inline-six cylinder engine. This 3.2-liter (3199 cc) powerplant featured a cast-iron block and an aluminum cylinder head, incorporating four valves per cylinder and multi-point fuel injection. The engine produced 220 horsepower at 5750 rpm and 307 Nm (226 lb-ft) of torque at 4000 rpm. The engine was a relatively simple design, prioritizing reliability and low-end torque over outright performance. The automatic transmission was a four-speed unit, providing smooth but not particularly quick shifts. This transmission was chosen to enhance the vehicle’s comfort and ease of driving, appealing to a broader audience than a manual transmission might.
Driving Characteristics
The Musso 3.2 Automatic offered a comfortable and capable driving experience. While not a sports SUV, the 3.2-liter engine provided adequate power for highway cruising and moderate off-road excursions. Acceleration from 0-60 mph took around 11.8 seconds, which was competitive for the time but not particularly brisk. The automatic transmission, while smooth, could feel somewhat sluggish, especially during overtaking maneuvers. The all-wheel-drive system provided good traction in various conditions, and the body-on-frame construction contributed to a robust and stable feel. Compared to the smaller 2.0-liter and 2.5-liter Musso variants, the 3.2 offered significantly more power and torque, making it better suited for towing and carrying heavy loads. However, it came at the cost of increased fuel consumption.
Equipment & Trim Levels
The Musso 3.2 Automatic typically came well-equipped, reflecting its position as a more premium trim level. Standard features often included air conditioning, power windows and locks, central locking, and an upgraded audio system. Interior upholstery was typically cloth or leather, with woodgrain trim accents. Optional extras could include a sunroof, upgraded sound system, and alloy wheels. The dashboard layout was functional and straightforward, prioritizing ease of use over stylistic flair. Safety features were relatively basic by modern standards, typically including ABS brakes and a driver’s airbag.
Chassis & Braking
The Musso utilized a traditional body-on-frame construction, providing a sturdy and durable platform. Suspension consisted of coil springs all around, offering a comfortable ride quality. Front and rear brakes were discs, providing adequate stopping power for the vehicle’s weight. The steering was hydraulic, offering reasonable feedback and ease of maneuverability. The 3.2-liter models often featured heavier-duty suspension components and larger brakes compared to the lower-spec variants to handle the increased power and weight.
Market Reception & Comparison
The Daewoo Musso 3.2 Automatic received mixed reviews from automotive critics. It was generally praised for its spacious interior, comfortable ride, and capable all-wheel-drive system. However, it was often criticized for its relatively unrefined engine, sluggish automatic transmission, and dated interior design. Compared to rivals like the Toyota RAV4 and Honda CR-V, the Musso offered more space and towing capacity but lacked the refinement and fuel efficiency of the Japanese competitors. Fuel economy was a significant drawback, with reported figures of around 13.2 mpg in the city and 19 mpg on the highway. Reliability was generally considered average, with some reports of issues with the automatic transmission and electrical components.
Legacy
The Daewoo Musso, while not a runaway success, played an important role in establishing Daewoo as a player in the SUV market. The 3.2-liter engine proved to be relatively durable, and well-maintained examples continue to be found on the used car market today. However, finding parts can be challenging due to Daewoo’s subsequent acquisition by General Motors and the discontinuation of the Musso model. The Musso is now regarded as a somewhat quirky and affordable SUV, appealing to enthusiasts seeking a robust and spacious vehicle with a unique character. Its body-on-frame construction and relatively simple mechanicals make it a potentially appealing option for those seeking a vehicle that is relatively easy to maintain and repair.
