The Chevrolet Cruze Sedan, specifically the facelifted model produced from 2013 to 2016, represented Chevrolet’s entry into the competitive compact car segment. The 2.0 TD (163 hp) Automatic variant was positioned as a mid-range offering, bridging the gap between the base model and potentially higher-trim levels with gasoline engines. This diesel-powered Cruze aimed to provide a balance of fuel efficiency and respectable performance for the North American market, though it found more significant sales success in Europe and other regions where diesel engines were more prevalent. It was built on the General Motors Delta II platform, shared with other compact models like the Opel Astra and Buick Verano.
Technical Specifications
| Brand | Chevrolet |
| Model | Cruze |
| Generation | Cruze Sedan (facelift 2013) |
| Type (Engine) | 2.0 TD (163 Hp) Automatic |
| Start of production | 2013 |
| End of production | 2016 |
| Powertrain Architecture | Internal Combustion engine |
| Body type | Sedan |
| Seats | 5 |
| Doors | 4 |
| Fuel consumption (urban) | 7.7 l/100 km (30.5 US mpg) |
| Fuel consumption (extra urban) | 4.6 l/100 km (51.1 US mpg) |
| Fuel consumption (combined) | 5.8 l/100 km (40.6 US mpg) |
| CO2 emissions | 151 g/km |
| Fuel Type | Diesel |
| Acceleration 0 – 100 km/h | 9.5 sec |
| Acceleration 0 – 62 mph | 9.5 sec |
| Acceleration 0 – 60 mph | 9 sec |
| Maximum speed | 210 km/h (130.49 mph) |
| Emission standard | Euro 5 |
| Weight-to-power ratio | 9.1 kg/Hp |
| Weight-to-torque ratio | 4.1 kg/Nm |
| Power | 163 Hp @ 3800 rpm |
| Torque | 360 Nm @ 1750 rpm (265.52 lb.-ft. @ 1750 rpm) |
| Engine layout | Front, Transverse |
| Engine Model/Code | LNP |
| Engine displacement | 1998 cm3 (121.93 cu. in.) |
| Number of cylinders | 4 |
| Engine configuration | Inline |
| Cylinder Bore | 86 mm (3.39 in.) |
| Piston Stroke | 86 mm (3.39 in.) |
| Compression ratio | 16.5:1 |
| Fuel injection system | Diesel Commonrail |
| Engine aspiration | Turbocharger, Intercooler |
| Engine oil capacity | 5.4 l (5.71 US qt | 4.75 UK qt) |
| Kerb Weight | 1490 kg (3284.89 lbs.) |
| Max. weight | 2028 kg (4470.97 lbs.) |
| Max load | 538 kg (1186.09 lbs.) |
| Trunk (boot) space – minimum | 469 l (16.56 cu. ft.) |
| Fuel tank capacity | 60 l (15.85 US gal | 13.2 UK gal) |
| Length | 4603 mm (181.22 in.) |
| Width | 1797 mm (70.75 in.) |
| Height | 1477 mm (58.15 in.) |
| Wheelbase | 2685 mm (105.71 in.) |
| Front track | 1544 mm (60.79 in.) |
| Rear (Back) track | 1558 mm (61.34 in.) |
| Drivetrain Architecture | Front wheel drive |
| Number of gears and type of gearbox | 6 gears, automatic transmission |
| Front suspension | Independent, type McPherson with coil spring and anti-roll bar |
| Rear suspension | Torsion |
| Front brakes | Ventilated discs |
| Rear brakes | Disc |
| Assisting systems | ABS (Anti-lock braking system) |
| Steering type | Steering rack and pinion |
| Power steering | Electric Steering |
Powertrain & Engine Architecture
The heart of the 2.0 TD Cruze was the LNP engine, a 1.998-liter inline-four cylinder diesel. This engine utilized a common rail direct injection system, delivering fuel at extremely high pressures for optimized combustion. A turbocharger with an intercooler was employed to boost power output and improve torque across a wider RPM range. The engine featured a relatively high compression ratio of 16.5:1, typical for diesel engines, contributing to its efficiency. The 6-speed automatic transmission was a crucial component, designed to work with the diesel engine’s torque curve. While not known for being particularly sporty, it provided smooth shifts and adequate performance for everyday driving. The transmission’s programming prioritized fuel economy over aggressive acceleration.
Driving Characteristics
The 163 hp and 265 lb-ft of torque provided by the 2.0 TD engine offered a noticeable step up in performance compared to the base 1.4L gasoline engine. Acceleration from 0-60 mph in around 9 seconds was respectable for the class. However, the automatic transmission, while smooth, did detract from a more engaging driving experience. Gear ratios were tuned for fuel efficiency, meaning the engine sometimes felt strained during quick overtaking maneuvers. Compared to a manual transmission equipped Cruze 2.0 TD, the automatic version felt slightly less responsive. The diesel engine’s torque delivery was strong from low RPMs, making it well-suited for highway cruising and providing ample power for merging onto freeways.
Equipment & Trim Levels
The 2.0 TD Automatic trim typically included standard features such as air conditioning, power windows and locks, a basic audio system with USB connectivity, and steel wheels with wheel covers. Higher trim levels, often available as optional packages, added features like alloy wheels, a more advanced infotainment system with a touchscreen display, cruise control, and upgraded interior upholstery. Safety features like ABS and stability control were standard. Interior materials were generally of average quality for the segment, focusing on durability rather than luxury.
Chassis & Braking
The Cruze Sedan utilized a McPherson strut front suspension and a torsion beam rear suspension. This setup provided a comfortable ride quality, though it wasn’t particularly sporty. The front brakes were ventilated discs, offering adequate stopping power, while the rear brakes were solid discs. ABS was standard. The suspension tuning was geared towards comfort and stability, rather than aggressive handling. The weight distribution was fairly balanced, contributing to predictable handling characteristics.
Market Reception & Comparison
The 2.0 TD Automatic Cruze received mixed reviews. Critics praised its fuel economy and comfortable ride, but some found the automatic transmission to be sluggish and the engine somewhat noisy compared to gasoline alternatives. Compared to the 1.4L turbo gasoline engine, the diesel offered significantly better fuel economy but less overall refinement. Against competitors like the Ford Focus and Honda Civic, the Cruze offered a competitive price point but often lagged behind in terms of driving dynamics and interior quality. The diesel version was more popular in Europe, where diesel fuel was cheaper and more readily available.
Legacy
The Chevrolet Cruze, including the 2.0 TD Automatic variant, experienced some reliability issues, particularly with the turbocharger and fuel injection system. However, with proper maintenance, these engines can prove relatively durable. On the used car market, the 2.0 TD Automatic Cruze represents an affordable option for buyers seeking a fuel-efficient and reasonably comfortable compact sedan. Its long-term value is dependent on maintenance history and overall condition. While not a standout performer, it remains a viable choice for those prioritizing fuel economy and practicality.
