2011-2014 Citroen C4 II Hatchback (Phase I ) 1.6 VTi (120 Hp) VTR+

The Citroen C4 II Hatchback 1.6 VTi (120 hp) VTR+ represents a mid-range offering within the second generation of Citroen’s popular C4 compact hatchback, produced between 2011 and 2014. Positioned as a balance between affordability and features, this variant aimed to appeal to buyers seeking a comfortable and reasonably efficient family car. It was part of the larger B-segment hatchback market in Europe, competing with vehicles like the Ford Focus, Volkswagen Golf, and Peugeot 308. The C4 II, built on the PSA Peugeot Citroën EMP2 platform (shared with the Peugeot 308), represented a significant departure from its predecessor, offering a more refined driving experience and a more modern interior.

Technical Specifications

Brand Citroen
Model C4
Generation C4 II Hatchback (Phase I, 2010)
Type (Engine) 1.6 VTi (120 Hp) VTR+
Start of production 2011
End of production 2014
Powertrain Architecture Internal Combustion engine
Body type Hatchback
Seats 5
Doors 5
Fuel consumption (urban) 8.8 l/100 km (26.7 US mpg, 32.1 UK mpg, 11.4 km/l)
Fuel consumption (extra urban) 4.7 l/100 km (50 US mpg, 60.1 UK mpg, 21.3 km/l)
Fuel consumption (combined) 6.2 l/100 km (37.9 US mpg, 45.6 UK mpg, 16.1 km/l)
CO2 emissions 143 g/km
Fuel Type Petrol (Gasoline)
Acceleration 0 – 100 km/h 10.8 sec
Acceleration 0 – 62 mph 10.8 sec
Acceleration 0 – 60 mph 10.3 sec
Maximum speed 193 km/h (119.92 mph)
Emission standard Euro 5
Weight-to-power ratio 10 kg/Hp, 99.6 Hp/tonne
Weight-to-torque ratio 7.5 kg/Nm, 132.8 Nm/tonne
Power 120 Hp @ 6000 rpm
Power per litre 75.1 Hp/l
Torque 160 Nm @ 4250 rpm (118.01 lb.-ft. @ 4250 rpm)
Engine layout Front, Transverse
Engine Model/Code 5FS EP6C
Engine displacement 1598 cm3 (97.52 cu. in.)
Number of cylinders 4
Engine configuration Inline
Cylinder Bore 77 mm (3.03 in.)
Piston Stroke 85.8 mm (3.38 in.)
Compression ratio 11:1
Number of valves per cylinder 4
Fuel injection system Multi-port manifold injection
Engine aspiration Naturally aspirated engine
Valvetrain DOHC
Engine oil capacity 4.25 l (4.49 US qt | 3.74 UK qt)
Kerb Weight 1205 kg (2656.57 lbs.)
Max. weight 1765 kg (3891.16 lbs.)
Max load 560 kg (1234.59 lbs.)
Trunk (boot) space – minimum 380 l (13.42 cu. ft.)
Trunk (boot) space – maximum 1183 l (41.78 cu. ft.)
Fuel tank capacity 60 l (15.85 US gal | 13.2 UK gal)
Permitted trailer load with brakes (8%) 1524 kg (3359.84 lbs.)
Permitted trailer load with brakes (12%) 1300 kg (2866.01 lbs.)
Permitted trailer load without brakes 640 kg (1410.96 lbs.)
Permitted towbar download 75 kg (165.35 lbs.)
Length 4329 mm (170.43 in.)
Width 1789 mm (70.43 in.)
Width including mirrors 2050 mm (80.71 in.)
Height 1489-1502 mm (58.62 – 59.13 in.)
Wheelbase 2608 mm (102.68 in.)
Front track 1522-1536 mm (59.92 – 60.47 in.)
Rear (Back) track 1515-1529 mm (59.65 – 60.2 in.)
Front overhang 935 mm (36.81 in.)
Rear overhang 786 mm (30.94 in.)
Drag coefficient (Cd) 0.30
Minimum turning circle (turning diameter) 10.7 m (35.1 ft.)
Drivetrain Architecture The Internal combustion engine (ICE) drives the front wheels of the vehicle.
Drive wheel Front wheel drive
Number of gears and type of gearbox 5 gears, manual transmission
Front suspension Independent, type McPherson with coil spring and anti-roll bar
Rear suspension Semi-independent, coil spring
Front brakes Ventilated discs
Rear brakes Disc
Assisting systems ABS (Anti-lock braking system)
Steering type Steering rack and pinion
Tires size 205/55 R16; 225/45 R17
Wheel rims size 16; 17

INTRODUCTION

The Citroen C4 II 1.6 VTi 120 hp VTR+ was introduced as a key variant in the C4 II range, beginning in 2011. It aimed to provide a balance between performance, fuel economy, and equipment levels. The VTR+ trim sat in the middle of the C4 II lineup, offering more features than the base ‘Attraction’ trim but falling short of the fully-equipped ‘Exclusive’ model. This model was primarily sold in Europe, where Citroen held a strong market presence, and was designed to appeal to families and individuals seeking a comfortable and practical hatchback.

Powertrain & Engine Architecture

At the heart of the C4 II 1.6 VTi VTR+ lies the PSA-developed 5FS EP6C 1.6-liter inline-four cylinder petrol engine. This engine is a naturally aspirated unit featuring multi-point fuel injection and a double overhead camshaft (DOHC) valvetrain with four valves per cylinder. The engine code ‘EP6’ is common across several PSA group vehicles. It produces 120 horsepower at 6000 rpm and 160 Nm (118 lb-ft) of torque at 4250 rpm. The engine’s design prioritizes fuel efficiency and smooth operation over outright performance. The engine is paired with a five-speed manual transmission, which was the standard offering for this variant. This transmission is known for its relatively light shift action, but isn’t particularly sporty in feel.

Driving Characteristics

The 1.6 VTi engine, coupled with the five-speed manual gearbox, delivers adequate performance for everyday driving. Acceleration from 0-100 km/h (0-62 mph) takes around 10.8 seconds, and the top speed is approximately 193 km/h (120 mph). However, it’s not a particularly quick car. The engine feels somewhat strained when pushed hard, and the lack of turbocharging means that peak torque is only available at higher engine speeds. Compared to the more powerful 1.6 THP turbocharged engine offered in other C4 II variants, the 1.6 VTi feels noticeably less responsive. The gear ratios are fairly well-spaced, but the engine lacks the low-end grunt of a diesel or turbocharged petrol unit. The focus is on providing a comfortable and refined driving experience, with a relatively quiet cabin and a compliant suspension setup.

Equipment & Trim Levels

The VTR+ trim level included a generous amount of standard equipment. Key features included air conditioning, a CD stereo with auxiliary input, electric front windows, electric door mirrors, and a height-adjustable driver’s seat. Safety features such as ABS, ESP (Electronic Stability Program), and front and side airbags were also standard. The interior typically featured cloth upholstery, with a dark grey color scheme being common. Optional extras included alloy wheels, a panoramic sunroof, rear parking sensors, and a more advanced audio system. The dashboard layout was functional and user-friendly, with a clear instrument cluster and logically arranged controls.

Chassis & Braking

The C4 II utilizes a McPherson strut front suspension and a semi-independent torsion beam rear suspension. This setup provides a good balance between ride comfort and handling. The front suspension incorporates a stabilizer bar to reduce body roll during cornering. Braking duties are handled by ventilated discs at the front and solid discs at the rear. ABS (Anti-lock Braking System) is standard, providing enhanced braking performance in emergency situations. The steering is a rack and pinion system, offering reasonable precision and feedback.

Market Reception & Comparison

The C4 II 1.6 VTi VTR+ was generally well-received by automotive critics. It was praised for its comfortable ride, spacious interior, and good value for money. However, some reviewers criticized the engine for its lack of power and refinement compared to competitors. Fuel economy was considered to be reasonable, but not class-leading. Compared to the diesel-powered C4 II variants, the 1.6 VTi offered lower running costs in terms of fuel, but higher maintenance costs due to the potential for timing chain wear. The 1.6 THP turbocharged petrol engine provided significantly more performance, but at a higher price point.

Legacy

The Citroen C4 II 1.6 VTi VTR+ remains a relatively common sight on European roads today. The 5FS EP6C engine, while generally reliable, is known for potential issues with the timing chain, particularly on higher-mileage examples. Regular oil changes and preventative maintenance are crucial to ensure long-term reliability. In the used car market, this variant offers an affordable and practical option for buyers seeking a comfortable and well-equipped hatchback. Its relatively simple mechanical design makes it easier and cheaper to maintain compared to more complex modern vehicles.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top