The Chevrolet Malibu IV Sedan, produced between 1979 and 1980, represented a significant downsize for the Malibu line, moving to a more compact platform after the larger models of the 1970s. This generation aimed to improve fuel efficiency and appeal to a changing market. Within the fourth generation, the 3.8 V6 with 115 horsepower was a mid-range offering, positioned between the smaller, more economical four-cylinder engines and the potential for larger V8 options in some markets. It was designed to provide a balance of performance and fuel economy for the average family sedan buyer. This variant played a role in Chevrolet’s attempt to compete with increasingly fuel-efficient imports during the late 1970s and early 1980s.
Technical Specifications
| Brand | Chevrolet |
| Model | Malibu |
| Generation | Malibu IV Sedan |
| Type (Engine) | 3.8 V6 (115 Hp) CAT |
| Start of production | 1979 |
| End of production | 1980 |
| Powertrain Architecture | Internal Combustion engine |
| Body type | Sedan |
| Seats | 6 |
| Doors | 4 |
| Fuel Type | Petrol (Gasoline) |
| Weight-to-power ratio | 12.2 kg/Hp, 82.1 Hp/tonne |
| Weight-to-torque ratio | 5.9 kg/Nm, 169.3 Nm/tonne |
| Power | 115 Hp @ 4000 rpm |
| Power per litre | 30.7 Hp/l |
| Torque | 237 Nm @ 2000 rpm, 174.8 lb.-ft. @ 2000 rpm |
| Engine layout | Front, Longitudinal |
| Engine displacement | 3751 cm3, 228.9 cu. in. |
| Number of cylinders | 6 |
| Engine configuration | V-engine |
| Cylinder Bore | 95 mm, 3.74 in. |
| Piston Stroke | 88.4 mm, 3.48 in. |
| Compression ratio | 8.6:1 |
| Number of valves per cylinder | 2 |
| Fuel injection system | Carburettor |
| Engine aspiration | Naturally aspirated engine |
| Valvetrain | OHV |
| Kerb Weight | 1400 kg, 3086.47 lbs |
| Trunk (boot) space – maximum | 470 l, 16.6 cu. ft |
| Fuel tank capacity | 68 l, 17.96 US gal | 14.96 UK gal |
| Length | 4895 mm, 192.72 in |
| Width | 1816 mm, 71.5 in |
| Height | 1354 mm, 53.31 in |
| Wheelbase | 2745 mm, 108.07 in |
| Front track | 1486 mm, 58.5 in |
| Rear (Back) track | 1467 mm, 57.76 in |
| Front overhang | 915 mm, 36.02 in |
| Rear overhang | 1235 mm, 48.62 in |
| Ride height (ground clearance) | 137 mm, 5.39 in |
| Minimum turning circle (turning diameter) | 12.2 m, 40.03 ft |
| Approach angle | 23° |
| Departure angle | 16° |
| Ramp-over (brakeover) angle | 14° |
| Drivetrain Architecture | The Internal combustion engine (ICE) drives the rear wheels of the vehicle. |
| Drive wheel | Rear wheel drive |
| Number of gears and type of gearbox | 3 gears, manual transmission |
| Front suspension | Independent, type McPherson with coil spring and anti-roll bar |
| Rear suspension | dependent spring suspension, Transverse stabilizer, Trailing arm |
| Front brakes | Ventilated discs |
| Rear brakes | Drum |
| Steering type | Steering rack and pinion |
| Tires size | 185/75 R14 |
| Wheel rims size | 6.0J x 14 |
Powertrain & Engine Architecture
The 3.8-liter V6 engine, internally known under various Chevrolet designations, was a staple of GM’s mid-size offerings. This particular iteration, equipped with a catalytic converter (CAT) to meet emerging emissions standards, utilized a two-barrel carburetor for fuel delivery. The overhead valve (OHV) valvetrain, while traditional, was known for its simplicity and relative ease of maintenance. The engine’s 8.6:1 compression ratio was a compromise between performance and the need to run on lower-octane gasoline, which was becoming increasingly important during the late 1970s. The 3-speed manual transmission was the standard offering for this engine, providing a relatively direct connection to the rear wheels. While an automatic transmission was available as an option, the manual was favored by those seeking slightly better fuel economy and a more engaging driving experience.
Driving Characteristics
The 115 horsepower and 174.8 lb-ft of torque provided by the 3.8L V6 were adequate for comfortable highway cruising and city driving, but it wasn’t a particularly sporty configuration. Acceleration was modest, and the 3-speed manual transmission meant relatively large gaps between gears. Compared to the four-cylinder Malibus, the V6 offered significantly more power, especially at lower RPMs, making it easier to navigate hills and carry a full load of passengers. However, it lacked the responsiveness of higher-output V6 or V8 options available in other GM vehicles. The rear-wheel-drive layout provided a balanced feel, but the suspension, while adequate, wasn’t designed for aggressive cornering.
Equipment & Trim Levels
The 3.8L V6 Malibu typically came with a fairly basic level of equipment. Standard features included cloth upholstery, a basic AM radio, and manual windows and locks. Air conditioning, power steering, and upgraded interior trim were available as options. The Malibu IV Sedan was offered in several trim levels, with the 3.8L engine often found in the mid-range models. These trims typically included slightly more comfortable seating and additional exterior brightwork. The focus was on providing a practical and affordable family sedan, rather than luxury or high performance.
Chassis & Braking
The Malibu IV Sedan utilized a body-on-frame construction, which was common for American cars of the era. The front suspension was an independent McPherson strut design, providing a reasonable level of ride comfort. The rear suspension, however, was a more traditional solid axle setup with leaf springs, which could result in a somewhat bumpy ride, especially over uneven surfaces. Braking duties were handled by ventilated discs in the front and drum brakes in the rear. The braking system was adequate for normal driving conditions, but lacked the stopping power of more modern systems. The steering was a rack-and-pinion setup, providing reasonably precise control.
Market Reception & Comparison
The 1979-1980 Chevrolet Malibu IV Sedan with the 3.8L V6 received mixed reviews. Critics generally praised its improved fuel economy compared to earlier, larger Malibus, but noted that it lacked the refinement and performance of some of its foreign competitors. The V6 engine was considered a good compromise between power and efficiency, but the 3-speed manual transmission was seen as somewhat outdated. Compared to the four-cylinder Malibu, the V6 offered a noticeable performance boost, but at the cost of slightly lower fuel economy. Compared to potential V8 options, it offered a more economical alternative, albeit with less power.
Legacy
The 3.8L V6 engine proved to be a relatively durable and reliable powertrain. Many examples of the 1979-1980 Malibu IV Sedan are still on the road today, a testament to the engine’s longevity. However, age and mileage have taken their toll on many of these vehicles, and finding well-maintained examples can be challenging. Parts availability is generally good, as many components were shared with other GM vehicles of the era. In the used car market, these Malibus are often sought after by collectors and enthusiasts who appreciate their classic American styling and relatively simple mechanical design. While not a particularly valuable or sought-after classic, they represent a significant chapter in Chevrolet’s history and a reminder of a time when American automakers were striving to adapt to a changing automotive landscape.


