The Chevrolet Metro 1.3 LSI (79 hp) was a subcompact hatchback produced from 1998 to 2007, representing the final generation (MR226) of the long-running Metro nameplate in the United States. Positioned as an entry-level vehicle, it was primarily aimed at budget-conscious buyers seeking economical transportation. The Metro, throughout its history, was a joint venture product between General Motors (Chevrolet) and Suzuki, with the MR226 generation largely based on the Suzuki Cultus. This variant, with its 1.3-liter engine and five-speed manual transmission, occupied the middle ground in the Metro lineup, offering a balance between affordability and acceptable performance. It served as a practical and fuel-efficient option in a market increasingly focused on larger, more feature-rich vehicles.
Technical Specifications
| Brand | Chevrolet |
| Model | Metro |
| Generation | Metro (MR226) |
| Type (Engine) | 1.3 LSI (79 Hp) |
| Start of production | 1998 |
| End of production | 2007 |
| Powertrain Architecture | Internal Combustion engine |
| Body type | Hatchback |
| Seats | 5 |
| Doors | 3 |
| Fuel consumption (urban) | 6.1 l/100 km (38.6 US mpg) |
| Fuel consumption (extra urban) | 5.5 l/100 km (42.8 US mpg) |
| Fuel Type | Petrol (Gasoline) |
| Maximum speed | 165 km/h (102.53 mph) |
| Weight-to-power ratio | 10.9 kg/Hp |
| Weight-to-torque ratio | 8.7 kg/Nm |
| Power | 79 Hp @ 6000 rpm |
| Power per litre | 60.8 Hp/l |
| Torque | 99 Nm @ 3000 rpm (73.02 lb.-ft. @ 3000 rpm) |
| Engine layout | Front, Transverse |
| Engine displacement | 1299 cm3 (79.27 cu. in.) |
| Number of cylinders | 4 |
| Engine configuration | Inline |
| Cylinder Bore | 74 mm (2.91 in.) |
| Piston Stroke | 75.5 mm (2.97 in.) |
| Compression ratio | 9.5:1 |
| Number of valves per cylinder | 4 |
| Fuel injection system | Multi-port manifold injection |
| Engine aspiration | Naturally aspirated engine |
| Valvetrain | OHC |
| Engine oil capacity | 3.3 l (3.49 US qt | 2.9 UK qt) |
| Coolant capacity | 4.5 l (4.76 US qt | 3.96 UK qt) |
| Kerb Weight | 860 kg (1895.98 lbs.) |
| Trunk (boot) space – minimum | 240 l (8.48 cu. ft.) |
| Trunk (boot) space – maximum | 635 l (22.42 cu. ft.) |
| Fuel tank capacity | 39 l (10.3 US gal | 8.58 UK gal) |
| Length | 3790 mm (149.21 in.) |
| Width | 1590 mm (62.6 in.) |
| Height | 1390 mm (54.72 in.) |
| Wheelbase | 2360 mm (92.91 in.) |
| Front track | 1380 mm (54.33 in.) |
| Rear track | 1360 mm (53.54 in.) |
| Drivetrain Architecture | Front wheel drive |
| Number of gears | 5 |
| Gearbox type | Manual transmission |
| Front suspension | Spring Strut |
| Rear suspension | Coil spring |
| Front brakes | Ventilated discs |
| Rear brakes | Drum |
| Assisting systems | ABS (Anti-lock braking system) |
| Steering type | Steering rack and pinion |
| Power steering | Hydraulic Steering |
| Tires size | 155/80 R13 |
Powertrain & Engine Architecture
The heart of the Metro 1.3 LSI was the G10 engine, a 1.3-liter inline-four cylinder gasoline engine. This engine, developed by Suzuki, featured a single overhead camshaft (OHC) design and multi-point fuel injection. The engine produced 79 horsepower at 6000 rpm and 99 Nm (73 lb-ft) of torque at 3000 rpm. The G10 engine was known for its simplicity and reliability, though it wasn’t a powerhouse. The five-speed manual transmission was a standard feature, providing drivers with reasonable control over the engine’s limited power band. The transmission’s gear ratios were geared towards fuel efficiency rather than rapid acceleration. The engine’s 9.5:1 compression ratio was typical for naturally aspirated engines of the era, balancing performance and fuel economy.
Driving Characteristics
The 1.3 LSI, with its 79 hp engine and manual transmission, offered adequate, but not exhilarating, performance. Acceleration was modest, and highway merging required planning. The five-speed manual transmission allowed drivers to keep the engine in its optimal power range, but the engine lacked the low-end torque found in larger displacement engines. Compared to the base model Metro, the 1.3 LSI provided a noticeable improvement in responsiveness. However, it fell short of the performance offered by larger vehicles in the segment. The steering was light and easy, making it maneuverable in city traffic. The suspension, while basic, provided a reasonably comfortable ride on smooth roads.
Equipment & Trim Levels
The 1.3 LSI trim level offered a step up in features compared to the base Metro. Standard equipment typically included air conditioning, a basic AM/FM radio, and cloth upholstery. Power windows and door locks were often optional extras. The interior was functional and spartan, prioritizing practicality over luxury. The dashboard layout was simple and easy to use. Optional equipment could include a CD player and upgraded interior trim. The LSI trim was aimed at buyers who wanted a few more comforts without significantly increasing the price.
Chassis & Braking
The Metro 1.3 LSI utilized a front-wheel-drive chassis with a MacPherson strut front suspension and a coil spring rear suspension. The braking system consisted of ventilated disc brakes on the front wheels and drum brakes on the rear wheels. Anti-lock braking system (ABS) was available, but not standard on all models. The suspension was tuned for comfort and fuel efficiency, rather than sporty handling. The relatively light weight of the vehicle helped to compensate for the modest braking power. The steering system employed a rack-and-pinion setup with hydraulic power assistance, providing light and responsive steering.
Market Reception & Comparison
The Chevrolet Metro 1.3 LSI was generally well-received by critics as an affordable and fuel-efficient transportation option. However, its lack of power and basic interior were often criticized. Compared to other subcompact cars of the era, such as the Honda Civic and Toyota Corolla, the Metro offered less refinement and performance but at a significantly lower price point. Its fuel economy was a major selling point, consistently achieving around 38 mpg in city driving and 43 mpg on the highway. The Metro’s reliability was also praised, making it a popular choice for budget-conscious buyers.
Legacy
The Chevrolet Metro, particularly the 1.3 LSI variant, has developed a cult following among enthusiasts seeking affordable and reliable transportation. The G10 engine is known for its durability, and many examples are still on the road today. While not a performance icon, the Metro represents a significant chapter in automotive history as one of the most affordable and fuel-efficient cars of its time. In the used car market, well-maintained Metros can be found at very low prices, making them attractive options for first-time car buyers or those seeking a simple and economical commuter vehicle. The simplicity of the design also makes it relatively easy and inexpensive to repair, further contributing to its enduring appeal.
