The Chevrolet Orlando 2.0 TD, produced between 2011 and 2018, was a seven-seat compact minivan designed to appeal to families seeking a versatile and affordable vehicle. Built on the GM Delta platform (specifically the 1HX0/A3 variant), the Orlando aimed to bridge the gap between smaller hatchbacks and larger, more expensive MPVs. The 2.0-liter turbodiesel engine, designated the LNP, was a key component of the Orlando’s appeal in European markets, offering a good balance of power and fuel economy. This variant occupied a middle ground in the Orlando lineup, offering more performance than the base 1.8-liter petrol engine but remaining more accessible than the higher-specification models.
Technical Specifications
| Brand | Chevrolet |
| Model | Orlando |
| Generation | Orlando I |
| Type (Engine) | 2.0 TD (131 Hp) |
| Start of production | 2011 |
| End of production | 2018 |
| Powertrain Architecture | Internal Combustion engine |
| Body type | Minivan |
| Seats | 7 |
| Doors | 5 |
| Fuel consumption (urban) | 7.9 l/100 km (29.8 US mpg) |
| Fuel consumption (extra urban) | 4.9 l/100 km (48 US mpg) |
| Fuel consumption (combined) | 6 l/100 km (39.2 US mpg) |
| Fuel Type | Diesel |
| Acceleration 0 – 100 km/h | 10.3 sec |
| Acceleration 0 – 62 mph | 10.3 sec |
| Acceleration 0 – 60 mph | 9.8 sec |
| Maximum speed | 180 km/h (111.85 mph) |
| Emission standard | Euro 5 |
| Weight-to-power ratio | 12.6 kg/Hp |
| Weight-to-torque ratio | 5.3 kg/Nm |
| Power | 131 Hp @ 3800 rpm |
| Torque | 315 Nm @ 2000 rpm (232.33 lb.-ft. @ 2000 rpm) |
| Engine layout | Front, Transverse |
| Engine Model/Code | LNP |
| Engine displacement | 1998 cm3 (121.93 cu. in.) |
| Number of cylinders | 4 |
| Engine configuration | Inline |
| Cylinder Bore | 86 mm (3.39 in.) |
| Piston Stroke | 86 mm (3.39 in.) |
| Compression ratio | 16.3:1 |
| Number of valves per cylinder | 4 |
| Fuel injection system | Diesel Commonrail |
| Engine aspiration | Turbocharger, Intercooler |
| Valvetrain | DOHC |
| Engine oil capacity | 5.6 l (5.92 US qt | 4.93 UK qt) |
| Coolant capacity | 7.5 l (7.93 US qt | 6.6 UK qt) |
| Kerb Weight | 1655 kg (3648.65 lbs.) |
| Max. weight | 2287 kg (5041.97 lbs.) |
| Max load | 632 kg (1393.32 lbs.) |
| Trunk (boot) space – minimum | 89 l (3.14 cu. ft.) |
| Trunk (boot) space – maximum | 458 l (16.17 cu. ft.) |
| Fuel tank capacity | 64 l (16.91 US gal | 14.08 UK gal) |
| Length | 4652 mm (183.15 in.) |
| Width | 1836 mm (72.28 in.) |
| Height | 1633 mm (64.29 in.) |
| Wheelbase | 2760 mm (108.66 in.) |
| Front track | 1584 mm (62.36 in.) |
| Rear track | 1588 mm (62.52 in.) |
| Minimum turning circle | 11.3 m (37.07 ft.) |
| Drivetrain | Front wheel drive |
| Number of gears | 6 |
| Gearbox type | Manual transmission |
| Front suspension | Independent type McPherson |
| Rear suspension | Torsion |
| Front brakes | Ventilated discs |
| Rear brakes | Drum |
| Steering type | Steering rack and pinion |
| Power steering | Hydraulic Steering |
| Tires size | 215/R60 R16 |
| Wheel rims size | 16 |
Powertrain & Engine Architecture
The heart of the Orlando 2.0 TD is the LNP engine, a 1998cc inline-four cylinder diesel. This engine utilizes a common rail direct injection system, delivering fuel directly into the combustion chamber at extremely high pressure for improved efficiency and reduced emissions. The engine features a single turbocharger with an intercooler, boosting power output and torque. The double overhead camshaft (DOHC) valvetrain, with four valves per cylinder, further enhances breathing and performance. The compression ratio is relatively high at 16.3:1, typical for a diesel engine. The six-speed manual transmission was the standard gearbox for this variant, offering precise gear changes and contributing to the vehicle’s fuel efficiency. The transmission’s gear ratios were tuned to provide a balance between acceleration and cruising comfort.
Driving Characteristics
The 131 hp and 315 Nm (232 lb-ft) of torque provided by the 2.0 TD engine delivered adequate performance for everyday driving. While not particularly sporty, the Orlando 2.0 TD offered sufficient power for overtaking and highway cruising, even when fully loaded with passengers and luggage. The six-speed manual transmission allowed drivers to keep the engine in its optimal power band. Compared to the 1.8-liter petrol version, the diesel offered significantly more torque, resulting in stronger acceleration, particularly at lower speeds. However, it lacked the responsiveness of the petrol engine. The manual transmission provided a more engaging driving experience than the optional automatic transmission available on other Orlando trims. The front-wheel-drive configuration provided predictable handling, although it wasn’t designed for aggressive cornering.
Equipment & Trim Levels
The Orlando 2.0 TD typically came equipped with a reasonable level of standard features. These included air conditioning, power windows, central locking, and a basic audio system with USB connectivity. Higher trim levels added features such as alloy wheels, rear parking sensors, cruise control, and a more advanced infotainment system. Interior upholstery was typically cloth, with options for leather upgrades. Safety features included ABS brakes, electronic stability control, and multiple airbags. The Orlando’s interior was designed with practicality in mind, offering flexible seating configurations and ample storage space.
Chassis & Braking
The Orlando 2.0 TD utilized an independent McPherson strut suspension at the front and a torsion beam suspension at the rear. This setup provided a comfortable ride quality, absorbing bumps and imperfections in the road surface effectively. The front brakes were ventilated discs, offering good stopping power, while the rear brakes were drums. This configuration was typical for vehicles in this weight class and price range. The steering was a hydraulic rack and pinion system, providing a reasonably direct and responsive feel. The Orlando’s chassis was designed to prioritize comfort and practicality over sporty handling.
Market Reception & Comparison
The Chevrolet Orlando 2.0 TD received mixed reviews from automotive critics. It was generally praised for its spacious interior, versatile seating configuration, and fuel efficiency. However, it was criticized for its somewhat bland styling and uninspiring driving dynamics. Compared to other compact minivans available in Europe, such as the Citroën C4 Picasso and Renault Grand Scénic, the Orlando offered a more affordable price point but lacked the refinement and sophistication of its rivals. The 2.0 TD engine was considered a good compromise between performance and economy, but some reviewers noted that it could be somewhat noisy under acceleration. The manual transmission was generally preferred over the optional automatic, which was criticized for being slow and inefficient.
Legacy
The Chevrolet Orlando, including the 2.0 TD variant, has established a reputation as a reliable and practical family vehicle. The LNP diesel engine, while not without its quirks, has proven to be relatively durable with proper maintenance. On the used car market, the Orlando 2.0 TD represents a good value proposition for buyers seeking a spacious and fuel-efficient minivan. However, potential buyers should be aware of the potential for diesel particulate filter (DPF) issues, particularly if the vehicle has been primarily used for short trips. Overall, the Orlando 2.0 TD remains a viable option for families on a budget.
