The Mazda BT-50 Dual Cab II XTR 3.2 4×4, produced from 2011 to 2014, represents Mazda’s entry into the highly competitive mid-size pickup truck market. This generation, built in collaboration with Ford (sharing a platform with the Ford Ranger T6), aimed to provide a robust and capable workhorse with a degree of refinement not always found in the segment. The XTR 3.2, positioned as a higher-spec trim level, offered a blend of performance, features, and off-road capability, targeting both commercial users and recreational drivers. It was primarily sold in markets outside of North America, including Australia, Europe, and parts of Asia and Latin America.
Technical Specifications
| Brand | Mazda |
| Model | BT-50 |
| Generation | BT-50 Dual Cab II |
| Type (Engine) | XTR 3.2 (200 Hp) 4×4 |
| Start of production | 2011 |
| End of production | 2014 |
| Powertrain Architecture | Internal Combustion engine |
| Body type | Pick-up |
| Seats | 5 |
| Doors | 4 |
| Fuel consumption (combined) | 8.9 l/100 km (26.4 US mpg, 31.7 UK mpg, 11.2 km/l) |
| Fuel Type | Diesel |
| Emission standard | Euro 4 |
| Weight-to-power ratio | 10.4 kg/Hp, 95.9 Hp/tonne |
| Weight-to-torque ratio | 4.4 kg/Nm, 225.3 Nm/tonne |
| Power | 200 Hp @ 3000 rpm |
| Power per litre | 62.5 Hp/l |
| Torque | 470 Nm @ 1750-2500 rpm (346.65 lb.-ft. @ 1750-2500 rpm) |
| Engine layout | Front, Longitudinal |
| Engine displacement | 3198 cm3 (195.15 cu. in.) |
| Number of cylinders | 5 |
| Engine configuration | Inline |
| Cylinder Bore | 89.9 mm (3.54 in.) |
| Piston Stroke | 100.7 mm (3.96 in.) |
| Compression ratio | 15.5:1 |
| Number of valves per cylinder | 4 |
| Fuel injection system | Diesel Commonrail |
| Engine aspiration | Turbocharger, Intercooler |
| Valvetrain | DOHC |
| Engine oil capacity | 9.75 l (10.3 US qt | 8.58 UK qt) |
| Coolant capacity | 12.9 l (13.63 US qt | 11.35 UK qt) |
| Kerb Weight | 2086 kg (4598.84 lbs.) |
| Max. weight | 3200 kg (7054.79 lbs.) |
| Max load | 1114 kg (2455.95 lbs.) |
| Fuel tank capacity | 80 l (21.13 US gal | 17.6 UK gal) |
| Permitted trailer load (braked) | 3500 kg (7716.18 lbs.) |
| Permitted trailer load (unbraked) | 750 kg (1653.47 lbs.) |
| Permitted towbar download | 350 kg (771.62 lbs.) |
| Length | 5365 mm (211.22 in.) |
| Width | 1850 mm (72.83 in.) |
| Height | 1821 mm (71.69 in.) |
| Wheelbase | 3220 mm (126.77 in.) |
| Front track | 1560 mm (61.42 in.) |
| Rear track | 1560 mm (61.42 in.) |
| Front overhang | 919 mm (36.18 in.) |
| Rear overhang | 1226 mm (48.27 in.) |
| Ride height (ground clearance) | 205 mm (8.07 in.) |
| Minimum turning circle | 12.4 m (40.68 ft.) |
| Approach angle | 28.2° |
| Departure angle | 26.4° |
| Ramp-over angle | 25.0° |
| Wading depth | 800 mm (31.5 in.) |
| Drivetrain Architecture | All wheel drive (4×4) |
| Number of gears | 6 |
| Gearbox type | Manual transmission |
| Front suspension | Double wishbone |
| Rear suspension | Leaf spring |
| Front brakes | Ventilated discs, 302 mm |
| Rear brakes | Drum, 295 mm |
| Assisting systems | ABS (Anti-lock braking system) |
| Steering type | Steering rack and pinion |
| Power steering | Hydraulic |
| Tires size | 265/65 R17 112T |
| Wheel rims size | 8.0J x 17 |
Powertrain & Engine Architecture
The heart of the BT-50 XTR 3.2 4×4 is the 3.2-liter Duratorq inline-five cylinder diesel engine. This engine, developed by Ford but adapted for Mazda’s application, is known for its robust construction and strong low-end torque. It utilizes a common rail direct injection system, delivering fuel at extremely high pressure for efficient combustion. The engine features a single variable geometry turbocharger (VGT) and an intercooler to enhance power and reduce emissions. The DOHC (Double Overhead Camshaft) valvetrain, with four valves per cylinder, contributes to improved breathing and overall engine efficiency. The 6-speed manual transmission was the standard offering for this variant, providing a good balance between fuel economy and driver control. The transmission’s gear ratios were tuned to maximize the engine’s torque output, making it well-suited for both on-road driving and off-road conditions.
Driving Characteristics
The BT-50 XTR 3.2 4×4, with its 200 horsepower and 470 Nm (346.65 lb-ft) of torque, offered a respectable level of performance for a mid-size pickup. While not as quick as some of its competitors with higher-output engines, the BT-50 excelled in providing usable power across a wide RPM range. The manual transmission allowed for precise control, and the relatively short gearing contributed to strong acceleration from a standstill. Compared to lower-powered variants of the BT-50, the 3.2-liter engine provided significantly more effortless performance, especially when carrying a load or towing a trailer. The 4×4 system, with its selectable modes, provided excellent traction in various off-road conditions. The ride quality, while typical of a body-on-frame pickup, was reasonably comfortable, although the leaf spring rear suspension could become somewhat bouncy when unladen.
Equipment & Trim Levels
The XTR trim level placed the BT-50 above the base models in terms of features and comfort. Standard equipment typically included air conditioning, power windows and locks, a basic audio system with CD player, and steel wheels with hubcaps. Higher-spec XTR models often featured alloy wheels, a more advanced audio system with Bluetooth connectivity, and additional comfort features like cruise control. Interior upholstery was typically cloth, with durable and practical materials used throughout the cabin. Optional extras could include a limited-slip differential, a tow bar, and various accessories for enhancing off-road capability or cargo carrying capacity.
Chassis & Braking
The BT-50 Dual Cab II utilized a traditional body-on-frame construction, providing a robust and durable platform. The front suspension featured a double wishbone setup, while the rear suspension employed leaf springs. This configuration was chosen for its load-carrying capacity and durability. The braking system consisted of ventilated discs on the front wheels and drum brakes on the rear. ABS (Anti-lock Braking System) was standard, enhancing safety during emergency braking situations. The steering system was a hydraulic rack and pinion setup, providing responsive and precise steering feel.
Market Reception & Comparison
The Mazda BT-50 Dual Cab II XTR 3.2 4×4 was generally well-received by automotive critics. It was praised for its robust engine, strong towing capacity, and comfortable ride. However, some reviewers noted that the interior design was somewhat utilitarian compared to some of its competitors. Compared to other trims in the BT-50 lineup, the 3.2-liter engine offered a significant performance advantage, but at a slightly higher price point. Fuel economy was competitive for a vehicle of its size and capability, averaging around 8.9 l/100 km (26.4 US mpg). Reliability was generally good, although some owners reported minor issues with the turbocharger and fuel injection system.
Legacy
The Mazda BT-50 Dual Cab II XTR 3.2 4×4 has proven to be a durable and reliable workhorse in the used car market. The 3.2-liter Duratorq engine is known for its longevity, provided it has been properly maintained. While not as technologically advanced as some newer pickups, the BT-50 remains a popular choice for those seeking a capable and affordable vehicle. Parts availability is generally good, and the relatively simple mechanical design makes it relatively easy to maintain and repair. Today, these vehicles can be found with reasonable mileage and are often sought after by those needing a dependable pickup for work or recreational purposes.
