The Ford Ranger III Double Cab, specifically the facelifted version produced from 2015 to 2018, represented a significant evolution of Ford’s globally popular mid-size pickup truck. This iteration of the Ranger, while not sold in the United States during these years, was a key product for Ford in Europe, South Africa, Australia, and parts of Asia. The 2.2 TDCi 160 horsepower four-wheel-drive variant occupied a crucial middle ground in the Ranger lineup, offering a balance of capability, fuel efficiency, and affordability. It aimed to appeal to buyers needing a versatile vehicle for both work and family use, without the higher price tag of the more powerful engine options.
Technical Specifications
| Brand | Ford |
| Model | Ranger |
| Generation | Ranger III Double Cab (facelift 2015) |
| Type (Engine) | 2.2 TDCi (160 Hp) 4×4 |
| Start of production | 2015 |
| End of production | 2018 |
| Powertrain Architecture | Internal Combustion engine |
| Body type | Pick-up |
| Seats | 5 |
| Doors | 4 |
| Fuel consumption (urban) | 8.2 l/100 km (28.7 US mpg) |
| Fuel consumption (extra urban) | 6.6 l/100 km (35.6 US mpg) |
| Fuel consumption (combined) | 7.1 l/100 km (33.1 US mpg) |
| CO2 emissions | 175 g/km |
| Fuel Type | Diesel |
| Acceleration 0 – 100 km/h | 11.8 sec |
| Acceleration 0 – 62 mph | 11.8 sec |
| Acceleration 0 – 60 mph | 11.2 sec |
| Maximum speed | 175 km/h (108.74 mph) |
| Emission standard | Euro 5 |
| Weight-to-power ratio | 13.1 kg/Hp |
| Weight-to-torque ratio | 5.5 kg/Nm |
| Power | 160 Hp @ 3700 rpm |
| Torque | 385 Nm @ 1500-2500 rpm (283.96 lb.-ft.) |
| Engine layout | Front, Longitudinal |
| Engine displacement | 2198 cm3 (134.13 cu. in.) |
| Number of cylinders | 4 |
| Engine configuration | Inline |
| Cylinder Bore | 86 mm (3.39 in.) |
| Piston Stroke | 94.6 mm (3.72 in.) |
| Compression ratio | 15.7:1 |
| Number of valves per cylinder | 4 |
| Fuel injection system | Diesel Commonrail |
| Engine aspiration | Turbocharger, Intercooler |
| Engine oil capacity | 8.55 l (9.03 US qt | 7.52 UK qt) |
| Coolant capacity | 11.5 l (12.15 US qt | 10.12 UK qt) |
| Kerb Weight | 2102 kg (4634.12 lbs.) |
| Max. weight | 3200 kg (7054.79 lbs.) |
| Max load | 1098 kg (2420.68 lbs.) |
| Fuel tank capacity | 80 l (21.13 US gal | 17.6 UK gal) |
| Length | 5277-5354 mm (207.76 – 210.79 in.) |
| Width | 1860 mm (73.23 in.) |
| Height | 1815-1848 mm (71.46 – 72.76 in.) |
| Wheelbase | 3220 mm (126.77 in.) |
| Front track | 1560 mm (61.42 in.) |
| Rear track | 1560 mm (61.42 in.) |
| Front overhang | 908 mm (35.75 in.) |
| Rear overhang | 1149-1226 mm (45.24 – 48.27 in.) |
| Ride height (ground clearance) | 223-237 mm (8.78 – 9.33 in.) |
| Approach angle | 28° |
| Departure angle | 28° |
| Ramp-over angle | 25° |
| Climb angle | 32° |
| Wading depth | 800 mm (31.5 in.) |
| Drive wheel | All wheel drive (4×4) |
| Number of gears | 6 |
| Gearbox type | Manual transmission |
| Front suspension | Independent coil spring |
| Rear suspension | Dependent suspension of two longitudinal semi-elliptic leaf springs |
| Front brakes | Ventilated discs |
| Rear brakes | Drum |
| Assisting systems | ABS (Anti-lock braking system) |
| Steering type | Steering rack and pinion |
| Power steering | Electric |
| Tires size | 215/70 R16; 255/70 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18 |
| Wheel rims size | 16; 17; 18 |
Powertrain & Engine Architecture
The heart of this Ranger variant is the 2.2-liter TDCi (Turbo Diesel Commonrail Injection) engine. This engine, part of Ford’s Duratorq family, is an inline-four cylinder diesel known for its robustness and relatively good fuel economy. The 160 horsepower output was achieved through a turbocharger with an intercooler, optimizing air intake for increased power and efficiency. The engine utilized a common rail direct injection system, delivering fuel directly into the cylinders at extremely high pressure for improved combustion. The engine code for this specific output varied by region, but commonly included variations of the ‘P22Z’ designation. The six-speed manual transmission was the standard offering, providing a good balance between fuel efficiency and driver control. The longitudinal engine layout was typical for this class of pickup, allowing for a more efficient drivetrain configuration for four-wheel drive applications.
Driving Characteristics
The 2.2 TDCi with the manual transmission offered a practical driving experience. While not exceptionally quick – 0-60 mph taking around 11.2 seconds – it provided sufficient power for everyday driving and hauling moderate loads. The torque output of 385 Nm (283.96 lb-ft) available from 1500-2500 rpm was the key strength, making it capable of towing and navigating challenging terrain. Compared to the higher-output 3.2-liter five-cylinder diesel option, the 2.2 TDCi felt less powerful, especially when fully loaded. However, it offered better fuel economy and a lighter front end, contributing to improved handling. The six-speed manual transmission was well-matched to the engine’s characteristics, providing a good spread of gears for both on-road cruising and off-road crawling.
Equipment & Trim Levels
The 2.2 TDCi Double Cab typically came with a reasonable level of standard equipment. Base models included air conditioning, power windows, central locking, and a basic audio system. Higher trim levels, such as Limited or Wildtrack, added features like alloy wheels, a more sophisticated infotainment system with navigation, leather upholstery, and climate control. Safety features generally included ABS brakes, driver and passenger airbags, and electronic stability control. Optional extras often included a rear differential lock, a tow bar, and various styling accessories.
Chassis & Braking
The Ranger III Double Cab utilized a robust ladder-frame chassis, providing a solid foundation for its load-carrying and towing capabilities. The front suspension consisted of independent coil springs, offering a comfortable ride on paved roads. The rear suspension employed a traditional leaf spring setup, designed to handle heavier loads. Braking was typically handled by ventilated discs at the front and drum brakes at the rear. The four-wheel-drive system offered selectable modes, allowing drivers to switch between two-wheel drive for fuel efficiency and four-wheel drive for enhanced traction in challenging conditions.
Market Reception & Comparison
The 2.2 TDCi Ranger Double Cab was generally well-received in its target markets. Critics praised its practicality, fuel efficiency, and robust build quality. It was often seen as a more sensible alternative to the larger and more expensive 3.2-liter models. Compared to competitors like the Toyota Hilux and Nissan Navara, the Ranger offered a comfortable ride and a well-equipped interior. However, some reviewers noted that the engine could feel strained when carrying heavy loads or climbing steep hills. Fuel economy was a strong point, consistently achieving around 33.1 US mpg in combined driving conditions.
Legacy
The Ford Ranger III Double Cab 2.2 TDCi has proven to be a reliable and durable vehicle in the used car market. The Duratorq engine is known for its longevity, provided it has been properly maintained. Common issues include wear and tear on suspension components and potential problems with the fuel injection system if not serviced regularly. Today, these Rangers represent a good value proposition for buyers seeking a capable and affordable pickup truck. Their robust construction and relatively simple mechanicals make them easier and cheaper to maintain than many newer, more technologically advanced vehicles.
