2006-2012 SsangYong Rexton I (facelift ) RX 320 Automatic (220 Hp)

The SsangYong Rexton I, specifically the RX 320 Automatic variant produced from 2006 to 2012, represents a significant step in the South Korean automaker’s ambition to compete in the mid-size SUV market. This facelifted version of the original Rexton (introduced in 2001) aimed to offer a more refined and powerful alternative to established Japanese and European competitors. The RX 320, positioned as a mid-to-upper trim level, combined a 3.2-liter inline-six engine with a five-speed automatic transmission, offering a blend of performance and convenience. It was primarily marketed towards families and individuals seeking a capable and spacious SUV with a degree of luxury, particularly in markets outside of North America where SsangYong had a stronger presence.

Technical Specifications

Powertrain & Engine Architecture

The heart of the RX 320 is the SsangYong G32D, a 3.2-liter inline-six cylinder gasoline engine. This engine, while not a cutting-edge design, was known for its relative smoothness and durability. It utilized a multi-port fuel injection system, a double overhead camshaft (DOHC) valvetrain, and a compression ratio of 10:1. The engine produced 220 horsepower at 5500 rpm and 310 Nm (228.64 lb-ft) of torque at 3750 rpm. The engine’s longitudinal mounting allowed for a traditional rear-wheel-drive layout, with the all-wheel-drive system engaging as needed. Paired with the engine was a five-speed automatic transmission. This transmission, while providing convenient shifting, wasn’t particularly known for its speed or efficiency compared to more modern automatic gearboxes. It was a conventional torque converter automatic, prioritizing smooth operation over outright performance.

Driving Characteristics

The RX 320 Automatic offered a comfortable, if not particularly sporty, driving experience. The 3.2-liter engine provided adequate power for everyday driving and highway cruising, but acceleration was not brisk. The automatic transmission, with its relatively widely spaced gear ratios, prioritized fuel economy over rapid acceleration. Compared to manual transmission versions of the Rexton, or those equipped with the available diesel engines, the RX 320 Automatic felt noticeably slower. The all-wheel-drive system provided enhanced traction in inclement weather, making it a capable vehicle for varied road conditions. However, the Rexton’s considerable weight (1815 kg / 4001.39 lbs) contributed to a somewhat ponderous feel in corners.

Equipment & Trim Levels

The RX 320 Automatic typically came equipped with a reasonable level of standard features. These included air conditioning, power windows and locks, a basic audio system, and alloy wheels. Higher trim levels offered options such as leather upholstery, a sunroof, upgraded audio systems, and parking sensors. The interior design was functional but lacked the sophistication of some European competitors. The focus was on providing a spacious and practical cabin rather than a luxurious one. The RX 320 often sat in the middle of the Rexton lineup, offering a step up in terms of engine power and features compared to the base models, but falling short of the fully-loaded luxury trims.

Chassis & Braking

The Rexton I utilized a body-on-frame construction, a traditional SUV design that prioritized robustness and off-road capability. The front suspension featured a double wishbone setup, while the rear employed a coil spring arrangement. Braking duties were handled by ventilated discs at the front and solid discs at the rear. An Anti-lock Braking System (ABS) was standard. The steering was rack and pinion with hydraulic power assistance. The suspension tuning was geared towards comfort, resulting in a relatively soft ride quality. However, this also meant that the Rexton exhibited noticeable body roll in corners.

Market Reception & Comparison

The SsangYong Rexton RX 320 Automatic received mixed reviews. Critics generally praised its spacious interior, comfortable ride, and capable all-wheel-drive system. However, the engine was often criticized for being somewhat underpowered for a vehicle of its size, and the automatic transmission was considered dated. Fuel economy was also a concern, with combined consumption figures of 14.4 l/100 km (16.3 US mpg) being relatively high for its class. Compared to competitors like the Toyota Land Cruiser Prado or Mitsubishi Pajero, the Rexton offered a lower price point but lacked the same level of refinement and brand recognition. The diesel variants of the Rexton were generally favored by European buyers due to their superior fuel economy and torque.

Legacy

The SsangYong Rexton I, including the RX 320 Automatic, represents an interesting chapter in the company’s history. While it didn’t achieve widespread success, it demonstrated SsangYong’s ambition to produce a competitive SUV. The G32D engine proved to be reasonably reliable, although maintenance costs can be higher due to the engine’s complexity and the relative scarcity of parts compared to more mainstream brands. On the used car market, RX 320 models are relatively affordable, but potential buyers should be aware of the potential for higher maintenance costs and the vehicle’s relatively poor fuel economy. The Rexton I laid the groundwork for subsequent generations of the Rexton, which have continued to evolve and improve in terms of technology, refinement, and market acceptance.