The Ford Focus III Hatchback ST 2.0 EcoBoost, produced from 2012 to 2014, represented the performance pinnacle of the third-generation Focus lineup in Europe and select global markets. Positioned as the hot hatch variant, it aimed to deliver a compelling blend of everyday practicality and engaging driving dynamics. This model was a key component in Ford’s strategy to offer a genuinely sporty alternative within the competitive compact segment, directly challenging rivals like the Volkswagen Golf GTI and Renault Mégane RS. The ST utilized a turbocharged EcoBoost engine and a six-speed manual transmission, setting it apart from the more economical, naturally aspirated and diesel-powered versions of the Focus III.
Technical Specifications
| Brand | Ford |
| Model | Focus |
| Generation | Focus III Hatchback |
| Type (Engine) | ST 2.0 EcoBoost (250 Hp) |
| Start of production | 2012 |
| End of production | 2014 |
| Powertrain Architecture | Internal Combustion engine |
| Body type | Hatchback |
| Seats | 5 |
| Doors | 5 |
| Fuel consumption (urban) | 9.9 l/100 km (23.8 US mpg) |
| Fuel consumption (extra urban) | 5.6 l/100 km (42 US mpg) |
| Fuel consumption (combined) | 7.2 l/100 km (32.7 US mpg) |
| CO2 emissions | 169 g/km |
| Fuel Type | Petrol (Gasoline) |
| Acceleration 0 – 100 km/h | 6.5 sec |
| Acceleration 0 – 62 mph | 6.5 sec |
| Acceleration 0 – 60 mph | 6.2 sec |
| Maximum speed | 248 km/h (154.1 mph) |
| Emission standard | Euro 5 |
| Weight-to-power ratio | 5.4 kg/Hp |
| Weight-to-torque ratio | 3.8 kg/Nm |
| Power | 250 Hp @ 5500 rpm |
| Torque | 360 Nm @ 2000-4500 rpm (265.52 lb.-ft.) |
| Engine layout | Front, Transverse |
| Engine Model/Code | R9DA |
| Engine displacement | 2000 cm3 (122.05 cu. in.) |
| Number of cylinders | 4 |
| Engine configuration | Inline |
| Cylinder Bore | 87.5 mm (3.44 in.) |
| Piston Stroke | 83.1 mm (3.27 in.) |
| Compression ratio | 9.3:1 |
| Number of valves per cylinder | 4 |
| Fuel injection system | Direct injection |
| Engine aspiration | Turbocharger, Intercooler |
| Valvetrain | DOHC |
| Engine oil capacity | 5.4 l (5.71 US qt | 4.75 UK qt) |
| Coolant capacity | 6.45 l (6.82 US qt | 5.68 UK qt) |
| Kerb Weight | 1362 kg (3002.7 lbs.) |
| Max. weight | 2050 kg (4519.48 lbs.) |
| Max load | 688 kg (1516.78 lbs.) |
| Trunk (boot) space – minimum | 277 l (9.78 cu. ft.) |
| Trunk (boot) space – maximum | 1062 l (37.5 cu. ft.) |
| Fuel tank capacity | 55 l (14.53 US gal | 12.1 UK gal) |
| Length | 4362 mm (171.73 in.) |
| Width | 1823 mm (71.77 in.) |
| Height | 1484 mm (58.43 in.) |
| Wheelbase | 2648 mm (104.25 in.) |
| Front track | 1544 mm (60.79 in.) |
| Rear track | 1534 mm (60.39 in.) |
| Minimum turning circle | 12 m (39.37 ft.) |
| Drivetrain | Front wheel drive |
| Number of gears | 6 |
| Gearbox type | Manual transmission |
| Front suspension | Independent type McPherson |
| Rear suspension | Independent multi-link suspension |
| Front brakes | Ventilated discs |
| Rear brakes | Disc |
| Assisting systems | ABS (Anti-lock braking system) |
| Steering type | Steering rack and pinion |
| Tires size | 235/40 R18 |
| Wheel rims size | 8.5J x 18 |
Introduction
The Ford Focus III Hatchback ST 2.0 EcoBoost, launched in 2012, was a significant step forward for Ford’s performance division. Built on the global C-platform (internally designated 1HX0/A3), the ST aimed to provide a more focused and engaging driving experience than the standard Focus models. It was positioned as a direct competitor to established hot hatches, offering a potent turbocharged engine, a sport-tuned chassis, and a distinctive aesthetic package. The ST was primarily marketed in Europe, Australia, and select Asian markets, with limited availability in North America.
Powertrain & Engine Architecture
At the heart of the Focus ST lay the 2.0-liter EcoBoost inline-four cylinder engine, bearing the Ford engine code R9DA. This engine was a heavily modified version of the Duratec 2.0L, featuring direct fuel injection, a low-inertia twin-scroll turbocharger, and a revised cylinder head with optimized intake and exhaust ports. The engine produced 250 horsepower at 5,500 rpm and 265 lb-ft of torque between 2,000 and 4,500 rpm. The fuel system utilized high-pressure direct injection, allowing for precise fuel delivery and improved combustion efficiency. The engine’s valvetrain employed a double overhead camshaft (DOHC) design with four valves per cylinder, maximizing airflow. The engine was mated to a six-speed manual transmission, providing precise gear changes and a direct connection to the drivetrain. The transmission featured short shift ratios designed to enhance performance and driver engagement.
Driving Characteristics
The Focus ST 2.0 EcoBoost delivered a noticeably more spirited driving experience compared to lower-spec Focus models. The turbocharged engine provided strong acceleration, with the peak torque available across a broad rev range. The six-speed manual transmission allowed for precise control, and the short gear ratios kept the engine within its power band. While not as raw or visceral as some of its competitors, the ST offered a well-balanced chassis and responsive steering. The suspension was tuned for a firmer ride, providing improved handling and reduced body roll. The car felt planted and stable during cornering, inspiring confidence in the driver. Compared to the standard Focus, the ST’s brakes were upgraded with larger rotors and calipers, providing improved stopping power.
Equipment & Trim Levels
The Focus ST came reasonably well-equipped as standard. Key features included sport seats with enhanced bolstering, a unique ST body kit (including front and rear spoilers, side skirts, and a rear diffuser), 18-inch alloy wheels, and a sport-tuned exhaust system. Inside, the ST featured a distinctive instrument cluster with unique graphics and gauges. Optional extras included a Sony premium sound system, navigation system, heated front seats, and bi-xenon headlights. Recaro seats were also available as an upgrade, providing even greater support and comfort.
Chassis & Braking
The Focus ST featured a revised suspension setup compared to the standard Focus. The front suspension utilized a McPherson strut design with stiffer springs and dampers, while the rear suspension employed an independent multi-link setup with similar upgrades. A thicker rear stabilizer bar was also fitted to reduce body roll. The braking system was upgraded with larger ventilated discs at the front and solid discs at the rear. Anti-lock braking system (ABS) was standard. The steering system utilized a rack-and-pinion design with electric power steering, providing precise and responsive steering feel.
Market Reception & Comparison
The Ford Focus ST 2.0 EcoBoost was generally well-received by automotive critics. It was praised for its strong performance, engaging handling, and practical hatchback body style. Some reviewers noted that the steering feel could be a bit numb, and that the ride was firm, but these were generally considered acceptable trade-offs for the car’s performance capabilities. Compared to the standard Focus, the ST offered a significant improvement in performance and handling. Compared to rivals like the Volkswagen Golf GTI, the Focus ST was often seen as offering a more raw and engaging driving experience, albeit with a slightly less refined interior. The fuel economy was respectable for a hot hatch, averaging around 32.7 US mpg in combined driving.
Legacy
The Ford Focus III ST 2.0 EcoBoost has proven to be a relatively reliable performance car. The EcoBoost engine, while complex, has generally been durable, and the six-speed manual transmission is known for its robustness. Common issues include occasional turbocharger problems and wear on the suspension components. Today, the Focus ST remains a popular choice among enthusiasts looking for an affordable and engaging hot hatch. Its combination of performance, practicality, and relatively low running costs makes it a compelling option in the used car market. The model helped solidify Ford’s reputation for building fun-to-drive performance cars and paved the way for future ST models.


