The Mercury Tracer III 2.0, produced between 1997 and 1999, represented the final iteration of the Tracer compact sedan. Built on the Ford CD170 platform – shared with the Ford Escort and Mazda Protegé – the Tracer III was positioned as a value-oriented offering within the Mercury lineup. The 2.0-liter engine variant, producing 110 horsepower, served as a mid-range option, slotting between the base 1.8L engine and, in some markets, higher-performance trims. This generation marked a significant update to the Tracer, offering improved styling, safety features, and a more refined driving experience compared to its predecessors.
Technical Specifications
| Brand | Mercury |
| Model | Tracer |
| Generation | Tracer III |
| Type (Engine) | 2.0 (110 Hp) |
| Start of production | 1997 |
| End of production | 1999 |
| Powertrain Architecture | Internal Combustion engine |
| Body type | Sedan |
| Seats | 5 |
| Doors | 4 |
| Fuel consumption (urban) | 8.4 l/100 km (28 US mpg) |
| Fuel consumption (extra urban) | 6.4 l/100 km (36.8 US mpg) |
| Fuel Type | Petrol (Gasoline) |
| Maximum speed | 185 km/h (114.95 mph) |
| Weight-to-power ratio | 9.9 kg/Hp |
| Weight-to-torque ratio | 6.5 kg/Nm |
| Power | 110 Hp @ 5000 rpm |
| Power per litre | 55.3 Hp/l |
| Torque | 169 Nm @ 3750 rpm (124.65 lb.-ft. @ 3750 rpm) |
| Engine layout | Front, Transverse |
| Engine displacement | 1988 cm3 (121.32 cu. in.) |
| Number of cylinders | 4 |
| Engine configuration | Inline |
| Cylinder Bore | 84.8 mm (3.34 in.) |
| Piston Stroke | 88 mm (3.46 in.) |
| Compression ratio | 9:1 |
| Number of valves per cylinder | 2 |
| Fuel injection system | Multi-port manifold injection |
| Engine aspiration | Naturally aspirated engine |
| Valvetrain | SOHC |
| Engine oil capacity | 3.8 l (4.02 US qt | 3.34 UK qt) |
| Coolant | 5 l (5.28 US qt | 4.4 UK qt) |
| Kerb Weight | 1093 kg (2409.65 lbs.) |
| Trunk (boot) space – minimum | 362 l (12.78 cu. ft.) |
| Fuel tank capacity | 48 l (12.68 US gal | 10.56 UK gal) |
| Length | 4437 mm (174.69 in.) |
| Width | 1700 mm (66.93 in.) |
| Height | 1354 mm (53.31 in.) |
| Wheelbase | 2499 mm (98.39 in.) |
| Front track | 1440 mm (56.69 in.) |
| Rear (Back) track | 1440 mm (56.69 in.) |
| Minimum turning circle | 9.6 m (31.5 ft.) |
| Drivetrain Architecture | Front wheel drive |
| Number of gears and type of gearbox | 5 gears, manual transmission |
| Front suspension | Independent, type McPherson with coil spring and anti-roll bar |
| Rear suspension | Independent multi-link suspension, Transverse stabilizer, Trailing arm |
| Front brakes | Disc |
| Rear brakes | Drum |
| Assisting systems | ABS (Anti-lock braking system) |
| Steering type | Steering rack and pinion |
| Power steering | Hydraulic Steering |
| Tires size | 185/65 R14 |
| Wheel rims size | 5.5J x 14 |
Powertrain & Engine Architecture
The heart of the Tracer III 2.0 was the Ford Zetec-E engine, a 1.998-liter (2.0L) inline-four cylinder powerplant. This engine, designated as the 2.0L SOHC, featured a single overhead camshaft (SOHC) design and multi-port fuel injection. The Zetec-E was known for its relatively smooth operation and decent power output for its displacement. The 110 horsepower peak was achieved at 5000 rpm, while the 169 Nm (124.65 lb-ft) of torque was available at 3750 rpm. The engine’s 9:1 compression ratio was typical for the era, balancing performance and fuel efficiency. The five-speed manual transmission was the standard offering, providing a reasonably direct connection to the engine. The transmission’s gear ratios were tuned for a balance of acceleration and highway cruising, though it wasn’t particularly sporty.
Driving Characteristics
The 2.0-liter Tracer III offered a noticeable improvement in performance over the base 1.8-liter model. While not a sports sedan, the 110 hp engine provided adequate power for everyday driving, including highway merging and passing maneuvers. The five-speed manual transmission allowed drivers to keep the engine in its optimal power band. Compared to the automatic transmission option available on other Tracer trims, the manual offered a more engaging driving experience and slightly better fuel economy. The suspension, featuring McPherson struts in the front and a multi-link setup in the rear, provided a comfortable ride, though it wasn’t particularly sporty. Body roll was noticeable in corners, and the steering lacked significant feedback.
Equipment & Trim Levels
The Tracer III 2.0 typically came standard with features such as air conditioning, power steering, and an AM/FM stereo. Higher trim levels, often denoted by specific packages, added features like power windows and locks, cruise control, and upgraded interior upholstery. Interior materials were generally durable but not luxurious, reflecting the Tracer’s value-oriented positioning. Optional extras included a sunroof, upgraded sound systems, and alloy wheels. The dashboard layout was functional and straightforward, with easy-to-read gauges and well-placed controls.
Chassis & Braking
The Tracer III utilized a front-wheel-drive layout with independent suspension all around. The front suspension employed McPherson struts with coil springs and an anti-roll bar, while the rear featured an independent multi-link setup with a transverse stabilizer. This suspension configuration aimed to provide a comfortable ride and reasonable handling. Braking duties were handled by disc brakes in the front and drum brakes in the rear. An anti-lock braking system (ABS) was standard, enhancing safety by preventing wheel lockup during hard braking. The tires were typically 185/65 R14, providing a good balance of grip and ride comfort.
Market Reception & Comparison
The Mercury Tracer III 2.0 was generally well-received by automotive critics as a practical and affordable compact sedan. It was praised for its comfortable ride, decent fuel economy, and relatively spacious interior. However, it was often criticized for its somewhat bland styling and lack of sporty driving dynamics. Compared to the base 1.8-liter model, the 2.0-liter version offered a noticeable performance improvement, making it a more appealing option for drivers who frequently drove on the highway or carried passengers. Fuel economy was comparable to other compact sedans of the era, averaging around 28 mpg in the city and 37 mpg on the highway. Reliability was generally good, though some owners reported minor issues with the fuel injection system and cooling system.
Legacy
The Mercury Tracer III, and specifically the 2.0-liter variant, has become a relatively affordable and reliable used car option. The Zetec-E engine is known for its durability, and parts availability remains good. While not a collector’s item, the Tracer III represents a solid and practical compact sedan from the late 1990s. Its simple design and relatively easy maintenance make it an attractive option for budget-conscious buyers or those seeking a dependable daily driver. Today, well-maintained examples can still provide years of reliable service, offering a glimpse into a bygone era of affordable and practical transportation.
