The Renault Master III Phase II, specifically the 2.3 dCi (110 hp) Crew Van L3H2 configuration, was a popular choice in the European commercial vehicle market from 2014 to 2016. Positioned as a versatile workhorse, this variant offered a balance between cargo capacity, passenger space (with seating for up to seven), and reasonable running costs. The L3H2 designation indicates a long wheelbase and high roof, maximizing interior volume. This generation of the Master, built upon the X62 platform, aimed to provide a robust and practical solution for businesses requiring a large-capacity van for both cargo and personnel transport.
Technical Specifications
| Brand | Renault |
| Model | Master |
| Generation | Master III (Phase II, 2014) Crew Van |
| Type (Engine) | 2.3 dCi (110 Hp) L3H2 |
| Start of production | 2014 |
| End of production | 2016 |
| Powertrain Architecture | Internal Combustion engine |
| Body type | Minivan, MPV |
| Seats | 7 |
| Doors | 4 |
| Fuel consumption (urban) | 8.9-9.2 l/100 km (26.4 – 25.6 US mpg) |
| Fuel consumption (extra urban) | 7-7.6 l/100 km (33.6 – 30.9 US mpg) |
| Fuel consumption (combined) | 7.7-8.2 l/100 km (30.5 – 28.7 US mpg) |
| CO2 emissions | 201-216 g/km |
| Fuel Type | Diesel |
| Emission standard | Euro 5 |
| Power | 110 Hp @ 3500 rpm |
| Torque | 285 Nm @ 1500 rpm (210.21 lb.-ft. @ 1500 rpm) |
| Engine Model/Code | M9T |
| Engine displacement | 2298 cm3 (140.23 cu. in.) |
| Number of cylinders | 4 |
| Engine configuration | Inline |
| Number of valves per cylinder | 4 |
| Fuel injection system | Diesel Commonrail |
| Engine aspiration | Turbocharger, Intercooler |
| Engine oil capacity | 8 l (8.45 US qt | 7.04 UK qt) |
| Coolant capacity | 11 l (11.62 US qt | 9.68 UK qt) |
| Max. weight | 3500 kg (7716.18 lbs.) |
| Trunk (boot) space – maximum | 9000 l (317.83 cu. ft.) |
| Fuel tank capacity | 105 l (27.74 US gal | 23.1 UK gal) |
| Length | 6198 mm (244.02 in.) |
| Width | 2070 mm (81.5 in.) |
| Width including mirrors | 2470 mm (97.24 in.) |
| Height | 2496 mm (98.27 in.) |
| Wheelbase | 4332 mm (170.55 in.) |
| Front track | 1750 mm (68.9 in.) |
| Rear track | 1730 mm (68.11 in.) |
| Front overhang | 842 mm (33.15 in.) |
| Rear overhang | 1024 mm (40.31 in.) |
| Ride height (ground clearance) | 172 mm (6.77 in.) |
| Drivetrain Architecture | Front wheel drive |
| Number of gears and type of gearbox | 6 gears, manual transmission |
| Front suspension | Independent, type McPherson with coil spring and anti-roll bar |
| Rear suspension | Leaf spring |
| Front brakes | Ventilated discs, 302 mm |
| Rear brakes | Disc, 305 mm |
| Tires size | 225/65 R16 |
| Wheel rims size | 16 |
Powertrain & Engine Architecture
The heart of the Master III 2.3 dCi 110 was the M9T engine, a 2.3-liter inline four-cylinder diesel. This engine utilized a common rail direct injection system, delivering fuel at high pressure for improved combustion efficiency and reduced emissions. A turbocharger with an intercooler further enhanced performance, providing increased air intake to the engine. The 110 horsepower output was achieved at 3500 rpm, while peak torque of 285 Nm (210 lb-ft) was available from just 1500 rpm, prioritizing low-end grunt for hauling and towing. The six-speed manual transmission was the standard offering for this variant, chosen for its durability and fuel efficiency. While an automated manual transmission (AMT) was available on some Master models, it wasn’t commonly paired with the 110 hp engine.
Driving Characteristics
The 110 hp 2.3 dCi engine, coupled with the six-speed manual gearbox, provided adequate, though not exhilarating, performance. Acceleration was modest, geared towards practicality rather than speed. The engine’s strong low-end torque made it well-suited for navigating urban environments and carrying heavy loads. The gear ratios were optimized for fuel economy and drivability, with a relatively tall sixth gear for comfortable highway cruising. Compared to the more powerful 125 hp or 150 hp versions of the 2.3 dCi, the 110 hp model felt noticeably slower, particularly when fully loaded. However, this trade-off resulted in improved fuel efficiency and lower running costs.
Equipment & Trim Levels
The Crew Van L3H2 trim level focused on functionality and practicality. Standard equipment typically included air conditioning, a driver’s airbag, electric front windows, and a basic audio system with USB connectivity. The Crew Van configuration featured seating for up to seven occupants, with a second row of seats behind the driver. Interior trim was durable and utilitarian, designed to withstand the rigors of commercial use. Optional extras included rear parking sensors, a navigation system, and upgraded audio systems. The dashboard layout was straightforward and functional, prioritizing ease of use.
Chassis & Braking
The Renault Master III utilized a front-wheel-drive layout, contributing to a lower load floor and improved space utilization. The front suspension employed an independent McPherson strut design with coil springs and an anti-roll bar, providing a reasonable level of ride comfort. The rear suspension featured a robust leaf spring setup, designed to handle heavy loads. Braking duties were handled by ventilated discs at the front and solid discs at the rear. The braking system was adequate for the vehicle’s weight and intended use, but lacked the sophistication of more advanced systems found in passenger cars.
Market Reception & Comparison
The Renault Master III 2.3 dCi 110 Crew Van L3H2 was generally well-received by commercial vehicle operators. Critics praised its spacious interior, practical design, and reasonable running costs. However, some reviewers noted the engine’s lack of outright power, particularly when compared to competitors like the Fiat Ducato or Mercedes-Benz Sprinter. Fuel economy was competitive, averaging around 30-35 mpg in real-world driving conditions. Reliability was generally good, although some owners reported issues with the diesel particulate filter (DPF) system, a common concern with modern diesel engines.
Legacy
The Renault Master III 2.3 dCi 110 Crew Van L3H2 remains a common sight on European roads today. The M9T engine, while not known for being particularly refined, proved to be relatively durable and reliable when properly maintained. In the used car market, these vans represent a cost-effective option for businesses requiring a large-capacity vehicle. However, potential buyers should be aware of the potential for DPF issues and ensure that the vehicle has been regularly serviced. The Master III established Renault as a significant player in the large van segment, paving the way for the current generation Master which continues to build on its predecessor’s strengths.
