The Renault Clio IV (Phase I) 1.2 TCe (120 Hp) GT Automatic, produced between 2013 and 2016, represents a significant iteration in the long-running and highly successful Clio lineage. As a cornerstone of the European B-segment (subcompact) market, the Clio has consistently been one of the continent’s best-selling cars. The fourth-generation Clio, launched in 2012, introduced a striking new design language, a more upscale interior, and a range of efficient powertrains. The specific 1.2 TCe (120 Hp) GT Automatic variant positioned itself as a sportier, yet still practical, offering within the Clio lineup, blending spirited performance with the convenience of an automatic transmission and enhanced features. While never officially sold in the United States, this model played a crucial role in Renault’s strategy to capture a youthful and dynamic segment of the European market, competing fiercely with established rivals through its blend of style, technology, and driving engagement.
Powertrain & Engine Architecture
At the heart of the Renault Clio IV (Phase I) GT Automatic is its lively 1.2-liter TCe (Turbo Control efficiency) gasoline engine, designated by the H5F 403 engine code. This inline four-cylinder unit, featuring a DOHC valvetrain and direct fuel injection, benefits significantly from turbocharging and an intercooler to deliver impressive power and torque for its displacement. With an engine displacement of 1197 cm³ (73.05 cu. in.), it produces a robust 120 horsepower at 4900 rpm, translating to an impressive power output of 100.3 horsepower per liter.
Torque figures are equally compelling, with 190 Nm (140.14 lb.-ft.) available, contributing to the car’s agile feel. This power is managed by a sophisticated 6-speed automatic transmission, driving the front wheels. The transmission itself is a conventional torque-converter automatic, chosen for its smoothness and refinement rather than outright performance. It features adaptive shift programming, adjusting gear changes based on driving style and conditions. The 6-speed configuration helps to maintain reasonable fuel economy while providing sufficient gear ratios for both acceleration and highway cruising. The engine’s compact and lightweight design, contributing to a favorable weight-to-power ratio of 8.2 kg/Hp (122.4 Hp/tonne), further enhanced the car’s dynamic capabilities.
Driving Characteristics
The 1.8L 90 hp Automatic configuration of the Clio IV offered a distinctly different driving experience compared to its manual counterparts or higher-output versions like the 1.2 TCe 120 hp. The automatic transmission, while providing convenience, resulted in a slightly less engaging driving experience. Acceleration from 0 to 60 mph took a brisk 8.2 seconds, and a maximum speed of 123.65 mph (199 km/h) was achievable. However, the automatic transmission’s shift points were programmed for efficiency, sometimes resulting in the engine feeling slightly strained during quick acceleration. Compared to the manual version, the automatic traded some responsiveness for ease of use.
The gear ratios were tuned to prioritize fuel economy and smooth cruising. The lower gears provided adequate acceleration for city driving, while the higher gears allowed for relaxed highway travel. The engine’s turbocharger provided a noticeable boost in power at higher RPMs, but the overall power delivery was more linear than peaky. The Clio GT Automatic was best suited for drivers who prioritized comfort and convenience over outright performance, making it an ideal choice for daily commutes and longer journeys.
Equipment & Trim Levels
The Clio IV (Phase I) GT Automatic trim level represented a step up from the base models, offering a more comprehensive list of standard features. Key standard equipment included air conditioning, power windows, power door locks, a height-adjustable steering wheel, and a basic audio system with USB connectivity. The GT variant specifically added sport seats with enhanced bolstering, unique alloy wheels (typically 17-inch with 205/45 R17 tires), sportier bumpers, and GT badging.
Interior upholstery typically consisted of a combination of cloth and synthetic leather. Optional extras available for the GT Automatic included a touchscreen infotainment system with navigation, rear parking sensors, automatic climate control, and a panoramic sunroof. Safety features were also enhanced, with the inclusion of electronic stability control (ESC), traction control, and multiple airbags. The overall interior design focused on a modern and ergonomic layout, with a driver-centric dashboard and intuitive controls.
Chassis & Braking
The Clio IV (Phase I) GT Automatic utilized a MacPherson strut front suspension and a semi-independent, coil spring rear suspension. This setup provided a good balance between ride comfort and handling. The suspension was tuned to be slightly firmer in the GT variant compared to standard models, offering improved body control and reduced roll during cornering. A stabilizer bar was fitted to both the front and rear axles to further enhance stability.
Braking duties were handled by ventilated discs on the front wheels and discs on the rear wheels. ABS (Anti-lock Braking System) was standard, providing enhanced braking performance and control in emergency situations. The braking system was adequately sized for the car’s weight and performance, offering consistent stopping power. The electric power steering system provided light and precise control, making it well-suited for both city driving and spirited country roads.
Market Reception & Comparison
Critics generally viewed the Renault Clio IV (Phase I) 1.2 TCe (120 Hp) GT Automatic favorably, praising its stylish design, comfortable interior, and efficient powertrain. The automatic transmission was noted for its smoothness, but some reviewers expressed a preference for the more engaging driving experience offered by the manual gearbox. Fuel economy was consistently highlighted as a strong point, with the 1.2 TCe engine achieving a combined fuel economy rating of 45.2 US mpg (5.2 l/100 km).
Compared to other trims in the Clio lineup, the GT Automatic offered a more premium experience with its enhanced features and sportier styling. It was positioned as a mid-range offering, bridging the gap between the base models and the more performance-focused Renaultsport variants. In terms of reliability, the 1.2 TCe engine proved to be generally reliable, although some owners reported minor issues with the turbocharger and fuel injectors. Overall, the Clio IV (Phase I) 1.2 TCe (120 Hp) GT Automatic represented a compelling package for buyers seeking a stylish, efficient, and well-equipped subcompact.
Technical Specifications
| Category | Specification |
| General Information | |
| Brand | Renault |
| Model | Clio |
| Generation | Clio IV (Phase I) |
| Type (Engine) | 1.2 TCe (120 Hp) GT Automatic |
| Production Start | 2013 year |
| Production End | 2016 year |
| Powertrain Architecture | Internal Combustion engine |
| Body type | Hatchback |
| Seats | 5 |
| Doors | 5 |
| Performance Specs | |
| Fuel consumption (economy) – urban | 6.6 l/100 km (35.6 US mpg, 42.8 UK mpg) |
| Fuel consumption (economy) – extra urban | 4.4 l/100 km (53.5 US mpg, 64.2 UK mpg) |
| Fuel consumption (economy) – combined | 5.2 l/100 km (45.2 US mpg, 54.3 UK mpg) |
| Fuel Type | Petrol (Gasoline) |
| Acceleration 0 – 60 mph | 8.2 sec |
| Acceleration 0 – 62 mph (0-100 km/h) | 8.6 sec |
| Maximum speed | 123.65 mph (199 km/h) |
| Emission standard | Euro 5 |
| Weight-to-power ratio | 8.2 kg/Hp (122.4 Hp/tonne) |
| Weight-to-torque ratio | 5.2 kg/Nm (193.9 Nm/tonne) |
| Engine Specs | |
| Power | 120 Hp @ 4900 rpm |
| Power per liter | 100.3 Hp/l |
| Torque | 190 Nm (140.14 lb.-ft.) |
| Engine layout | Front, Transverse |
| Engine Model/Code | H5F 403 |
| Engine displacement | 1197 cm³ (73.05 cu. in.) |
| Number of cylinders | 4 |
| Engine configuration | Inline |
| Cylinder Bore | 72.2 mm (2.84 in.) |
| Piston Stroke | 73.1 mm (2.88 in.) |
| Compression ratio | 9.8:1 |
| Number of valves per cylinder | 4 |
| Fuel injection system | Direct injection |
| Engine aspiration | Turbocharger, Intercooler |
| Valvetrain | DOHC |
| Engine oil capacity | 4.6 l (4.86 US qt) |
| Coolant capacity | 5 l (5.28 US qt) |
| Space, Volume and Weights | |
| Kerb Weight | 980 kg (2160.53 lbs.) |
| Trunk (boot) space – minimum | 300 l (10.59 cu. ft.) |
| Fuel tank capacity | 45 l (11.89 US gal) |
| Dimensions | |
| Length | 4062 mm (159.92 in.) |
| Width | 1732 mm (68.19 in.) |
| Height | 1448 mm (57.01 in.) |
| Wheelbase | 2589 mm (101.93 in.) |
| Front track | 1506 mm (59.29 in.) |
| Rear (Back) track | 1506 mm (59.29 in.) |
| Minimum turning circle (diameter) | 10.6 m (34.78 ft.) |
| Drivetrain, Brakes and Suspension Specs | |
| Drivetrain Architecture | Internal combustion engine (ICE) drives the front wheels |
| Drive wheel | Front wheel drive |
| Number of gears and type of gearbox | 6 gears, automatic transmission |
| Front suspension | Independent type McPherson |
| Rear suspension | Semi-independent, coil spring |
| Front brakes | Ventilated discs |
| Rear brakes | Disc |
| Assisting systems | ABS (Anti-lock braking system) |
| Steering type | Steering rack and pinion |
| Power steering | Electric Steering |
| Tires size | 205/45 R17 |
| Wheel rims size | 17 inches |
Legacy
The Renault Clio IV, and particularly the 1.2 TCe (120 Hp) GT Automatic variant, solidified the Clio’s reputation as a stylish, capable, and desirable subcompact in the highly competitive European market. Despite not being offered in North America, the Clio continued its legacy as one of France’s and Europe’s best-selling cars, often vying for the top spot against formidable rivals like the Ford Fiesta, Volkswagen Polo, Peugeot 208, and Opel Corsa. The GT Automatic model specifically carved out a niche for buyers who desired more performance and a sportier aesthetic than standard Clio models, but still valued the convenience and efficiency of an automatic transmission for daily driving. It offered a compelling alternative to more overtly “hot” hatchbacks by providing a blend of everyday usability with engaging dynamics.
Its impact was significant in demonstrating that a smaller engine, when combined with modern turbocharging technology, could deliver respectable performance without sacrificing fuel economy. This particular powertrain showcased Renault’s engineering prowess in downsized engines, a trend that became increasingly prevalent across the automotive industry. The Clio IV’s bold design also influenced subsequent Renault models and helped to rejuvenate the brand’s image, making it appealing to a younger demographic. Its success underscored the importance of design, technology, and a diverse range of powertrains in maintaining relevance in a segment where consumer preferences are constantly evolving. The Clio IV remains a popular used car in Europe, a testament to its enduring appeal and robust engineering.
