The Daewoo Musso (FJ) 3.2 24V, produced from 1995 to 2002, was a mid-size SUV representing Daewoo’s foray into the increasingly popular sport utility vehicle segment. Built upon a body-on-frame chassis, the Musso aimed to provide a robust and capable vehicle for both on and off-road use. This particular variant, equipped with the 3.2-liter inline-six engine and a five-speed manual transmission, occupied a position towards the higher end of the Musso lineup, offering a balance of performance and practicality. The Musso was primarily marketed in Europe, Australia, and parts of Asia, and was notable for being one of the last vehicles produced under the Daewoo brand before its acquisition by General Motors.
Technical Specifications
| Brand | Daewoo |
| Model | Musso |
| Generation | Musso (FJ) |
| Type (Engine) | 3.2 24V (220 Hp) |
| Start of production | 1995 |
| End of production | 2002 |
| Powertrain Architecture | Internal Combustion engine |
| Body type | SUV |
| Seats | 5 |
| Doors | 5 |
| Fuel consumption (urban) | 16.9 l/100 km (13.9 US mpg / 16.7 UK mpg) |
| Fuel consumption (extra urban) | 11 l/100 km (21.4 US mpg / 25.7 UK mpg) |
| Fuel Type | Petrol (Gasoline) |
| Acceleration 0 – 100 km/h | 10.2 sec |
| Acceleration 0 – 62 mph | 10.2 sec |
| Acceleration 0 – 60 mph | 9.7 sec |
| Maximum speed | 190 km/h (118.06 mph) |
| Weight-to-power ratio | 8.8 kg/Hp |
| Weight-to-torque ratio | 6.3 kg/Nm |
| Power | 220 Hp @ 5750 rpm |
| Power per litre | 68.8 Hp/l |
| Torque | 307 Nm @ 4000 rpm (226.43 lb.-ft. @ 4000 rpm) |
| Engine layout | Front, Longitudinal |
| Engine displacement | 3199 cm3 (195.21 cu. in.) |
| Number of cylinders | 6 |
| Engine configuration | Inline |
| Cylinder Bore | 89.9 mm (3.54 in.) |
| Piston Stroke | 84 mm (3.31 in.) |
| Compression ratio | 10:1 |
| Number of valves per cylinder | 4 |
| Fuel injection system | Multi-port manifold injection |
| Engine aspiration | Naturally aspirated engine |
| Engine oil capacity | 6.7 l (7.08 US qt | 5.9 UK qt) |
| Coolant capacity | 11 l (11.62 US qt | 9.68 UK qt) |
| Kerb Weight | 1935 kg (4265.94 lbs.) |
| Max. weight | 2520 kg (5555.65 lbs.) |
| Max load | 585 kg (1289.7 lbs.) |
| Trunk (boot) space – minimum | 780 l (27.55 cu. ft.) |
| Trunk (boot) space – maximum | 1910 l (67.45 cu. ft.) |
| Fuel tank capacity | 80 l (21.13 US gal | 17.6 UK gal) |
| Length | 4640 mm (182.68 in.) |
| Width | 1864 mm (73.39 in.) |
| Height | 1735 mm (68.31 in.) |
| Wheelbase | 2630 mm (103.54 in.) |
| Front track | 1510 mm (59.45 in.) |
| Rear track | 1520 mm (59.84 in.) |
| Drive wheel | All wheel drive (4×4) |
| Number of gears | 5 gears, manual transmission |
| Front suspension | Coil spring |
| Rear suspension | Coil spring |
| Front brakes | Disc |
| Rear brakes | Disc |
| Assisting systems | ABS (Anti-lock braking system) |
| Power steering | Hydraulic Steering |
| Tires size | 255/70 R15 |
Powertrain & Engine Architecture
The heart of the Musso 3.2 was Daewoo’s 3.2-liter inline-six cylinder engine. Designated as the 6XF, this engine featured a cast iron block and an aluminum cylinder head with four valves per cylinder. It utilized a multi-port fuel injection system, delivering fuel directly into the intake ports, and a single overhead camshaft. The engine produced 220 horsepower at 5750 rpm and 307 Nm (226 lb-ft) of torque at 4000 rpm. This engine was notable for its relatively smooth operation and decent power output for its time. The five-speed manual transmission provided a direct and engaging driving experience, with gear ratios tailored for both on-road cruising and off-road capability. The transmission was a conventional design, known for its durability, but not particularly refined compared to more modern automatic options.
Driving Characteristics
The Musso 3.2 with the manual transmission offered a reasonably spirited driving experience. While not a sports car, the engine’s torque output provided adequate acceleration, with a 0-60 mph time of around 9.7 seconds. The manual gearbox allowed for precise control over the engine’s power, making it easier to navigate challenging terrain. Compared to potential automatic versions (which were available in other Musso trims), the manual offered a more connected feel and better fuel economy. The Musso’s body-on-frame construction resulted in a noticeable body roll during cornering, but the suspension provided a comfortable ride on most road surfaces. The four-wheel-drive system, selectable via a transfer case, enhanced traction in slippery conditions.
Equipment & Trim Levels
The Musso 3.2 typically came equipped with a reasonable level of standard features. Interior appointments included cloth upholstery, power windows, and central locking. Air conditioning was often standard, though some base models might have offered it as an option. Higher trim levels could add features like leather upholstery, a sunroof, and upgraded audio systems. The dashboard layout was functional but somewhat dated, even for the late 1990s. Safety features were relatively basic, typically including ABS brakes and driver/passenger airbags. The Musso wasn’t known for its luxurious appointments, but it provided a practical and comfortable interior for its price point.
Chassis & Braking
The Musso’s chassis was a traditional body-on-frame design, providing a robust and durable platform. The front suspension utilized coil springs and independent double wishbones, while the rear suspension employed a multi-link coil spring setup. This configuration aimed to balance ride comfort with off-road capability. Braking duties were handled by disc brakes on all four wheels, providing adequate stopping power. The ABS system helped to prevent wheel lockup during hard braking. The Musso’s steering was hydraulically assisted, offering reasonable maneuverability, though it lacked the precision of more modern steering systems.
Market Reception & Comparison
The Daewoo Musso 3.2 received mixed reviews from automotive critics. It was generally praised for its spacious interior, robust construction, and capable four-wheel-drive system. However, it was often criticized for its dated styling, basic interior appointments, and somewhat unrefined driving experience. Compared to competitors like the Toyota RAV4 or Honda CR-V, the Musso offered a more rugged and utilitarian experience, but lacked the sophistication and fuel efficiency of those vehicles. Fuel economy was a notable weakness, with the 3.2-liter engine consuming a significant amount of fuel, particularly in urban driving. Reliability was generally considered average, with some reports of issues with the fuel injection system and cooling system.
Legacy
The Daewoo Musso, while not a runaway success, remains a relatively popular vehicle in the used car market, particularly among those seeking a capable and affordable SUV. The 3.2-liter engine, when properly maintained, is known for its durability. However, finding parts can be challenging due to Daewoo’s limited presence in many markets after its acquisition by General Motors. The Musso represents a unique chapter in automotive history, showcasing Daewoo’s ambition to compete in the global SUV market. Today, it’s often appreciated by enthusiasts for its rugged character and relatively simple mechanical design, making it a viable option for those seeking a classic off-road vehicle.
