The Daihatsu Xenia II (F650) 1.3, produced from 2011 to 2015, represented an important iteration of Daihatsu’s popular multi-purpose vehicle (MPV) primarily aimed at the Indonesian and broader Southeast Asian markets. Positioned as an affordable and practical family vehicle, the 1.3-liter variant served as the entry point to the Xenia II lineup, offering a balance between fuel efficiency and usability. It was built upon the F650 platform, a revised version of the original Xenia’s chassis, and distinguished itself through its seven-seat configuration and rear-wheel-drive layout – a configuration increasingly uncommon in modern MPVs. This generation aimed to address criticisms of the first Xenia, offering improved refinement and safety features, though it largely retained the core functionality that made the original a sales success.
Technical Specifications
| Brand | Daihatsu |
| Model | Xenia |
| Generation | Xenia II (F650) |
| Type (Engine) | 1.3 (92 Hp) |
| Start of production | November, 2011 |
| End of production | 2015 |
| Powertrain Architecture | Internal Combustion engine |
| Body type | MPV |
| Seats | 7 |
| Doors | 5 |
| Fuel Type | Petrol (Gasoline) |
| Weight-to-power ratio | 11.4 kg/Hp, 87.6 Hp/tonne |
| Weight-to-torque ratio | 9 kg/Nm, 111.4 Nm/tonne |
| Power | 92 Hp @ 6000 rpm |
| Power per litre | 70.9 Hp/l |
| Torque | 117 Nm @ 4400 rpm (86.29 lb.-ft. @ 4400 rpm) |
| Engine layout | Front, Longitudinal |
| Engine Model/Code | K3-VE |
| Engine displacement | 1298 cm3 (79.21 cu. in.) |
| Number of cylinders | 4 |
| Engine configuration | Inline |
| Cylinder Bore | 72 mm (2.83 in.) |
| Piston Stroke | 79.7 mm (3.14 in.) |
| Number of valves per cylinder | 4 |
| Fuel injection system | Multi-port manifold injection |
| Engine aspiration | Naturally aspirated engine |
| Valvetrain | DOHC, VVT-i |
| Kerb Weight | 1050-1065 kg (2314.85 – 2347.92 lbs.) |
| Max. weight | 1585 kg (3494.33 lbs.) |
| Max load | 520-535 kg (1146.4 – 1179.47 lbs.) |
| Fuel tank capacity | 45 l (11.89 US gal | 9.9 UK gal) |
| Length | 4140 mm (162.99 in.) |
| Width | 1660 mm (65.35 in.) |
| Height | 1695 mm (66.73 in.) |
| Wheelbase | 2655 mm (104.53 in.) |
| Front track | 1425 mm (56.1 in.) |
| Rear (Back) track | 1435 mm (56.5 in.) |
| Ride height (ground clearance) | 180-200 mm (7.09 – 7.87 in.) |
| Minimum turning circle (turning diameter) | 9.4 m (30.84 ft.) |
| Drivetrain Architecture | The Internal combustion engine (ICE) drives the rear wheels of the vehicle. |
| Drive wheel | Rear wheel drive |
| Number of gears and type of gearbox | 5 gears, manual transmission |
| Front suspension | Independent, type McPherson with coil spring and anti-roll bar |
| Rear suspension | Rigid axle suspension |
| Front brakes | Disc |
| Rear brakes | Drum |
| Steering type | Steering rack and pinion |
| Power steering | Electric Steering |
| Tires size | 185/70 R14 |
| Wheel rims size | 5.5J x 14 |
Powertrain & Engine Architecture
The heart of the Xenia II 1.3 was the K3-VE engine, a 1.3-liter inline-four cylinder petrol engine. This engine was a staple in many Daihatsu and Toyota models in the region, known for its relative simplicity and durability. The K3-VE featured a double overhead camshaft (DOHC) valvetrain with Variable Valve Timing-intelligent (VVT-i) technology, which optimized valve timing for improved fuel efficiency and power delivery. Fuel delivery was handled by a multi-port fuel injection system. The engine produced 92 horsepower at 6000 rpm and 117 Nm (86.29 lb-ft) of torque at 4400 rpm. The engine’s longitudinal mounting, coupled with a rear-wheel-drive configuration, was a notable characteristic, setting it apart from many contemporary MPVs that adopted front-wheel drive. The standard transmission was a 5-speed manual, providing direct control over the engine’s power. An optional 4-speed automatic transmission was also available, though it impacted fuel economy and performance.
Driving Characteristics
The 1.3-liter engine, paired with the manual transmission, provided adequate, though not exhilarating, performance for everyday driving. Acceleration was modest, particularly when fully loaded with passengers and cargo. The rear-wheel-drive layout offered a different driving feel compared to front-wheel-drive MPVs, with a slightly more balanced weight distribution. The 5-speed manual transmission allowed drivers to keep the engine in its optimal power band, improving responsiveness. The optional automatic transmission, while offering convenience, resulted in noticeable performance degradation due to its fewer gears and torque converter losses. Gear ratios were tuned for fuel efficiency rather than outright speed, making it well-suited for urban commutes and highway cruising at moderate speeds. The suspension, while functional, prioritized comfort over sporty handling.
Equipment & Trim Levels
The Xenia II 1.3 typically came with a basic level of equipment, reflecting its position as the entry-level trim. Standard features generally included air conditioning, power steering, and basic instrumentation. Interior upholstery was typically cloth, and the dashboard featured a functional, if somewhat utilitarian, design. Optional extras included power windows, central locking, and an upgraded audio system. Higher trim levels, such as the 1.3 X, added features like alloy wheels, fog lamps, and a more refined interior. Safety features were relatively basic, typically including seatbelts for all occupants, but lacking advanced features like airbags or ABS in the base model.
Chassis & Braking
The Xenia II utilized a body-on-frame construction, a relatively traditional approach that contributed to its robustness and affordability. The front suspension employed an independent McPherson strut setup with coil springs and an anti-roll bar, providing a reasonable level of ride comfort. The rear suspension featured a rigid axle setup, which was simpler and more cost-effective but less sophisticated than independent rear suspension. Braking duties were handled by disc brakes at the front and drum brakes at the rear. The braking system was adequate for normal driving conditions, but lacked the stopping power and modulation of more advanced systems. Steering was rack and pinion, assisted by electric power steering, providing light and easy maneuverability.
Market Reception & Comparison
The Daihatsu Xenia II 1.3 was well-received in its target markets, particularly Indonesia, due to its affordability, practicality, and spacious interior. Critics generally praised its value for money and its ability to comfortably accommodate large families. However, the 1.3-liter engine was often criticized for being underpowered, especially when the vehicle was fully loaded. Compared to the higher-spec 1.5-liter variants, the 1.3 offered significantly less performance but boasted better fuel economy. The 1.5-liter models were favored by those who prioritized performance and were willing to pay a premium. The Xenia also competed with other MPVs in the region, such as the Toyota Avanza (which shared many components with the Xenia), and the Suzuki Ertiga.
Legacy
The Daihatsu Xenia II 1.3 remains a common sight on the roads of Southeast Asia. The K3-VE engine, while not known for being particularly high-tech, has proven to be relatively reliable and durable, with many examples still in service today. Maintenance costs are generally low, thanks to the engine’s simplicity and the widespread availability of spare parts. In the used car market, the Xenia II 1.3 represents an affordable and practical option for budget-conscious buyers seeking a spacious family vehicle. While it may not offer the refinement or performance of more modern MPVs, its robust construction and proven reliability continue to make it a popular choice.



