The Ford Ranger I Super Cab 2.5 TDCi 4×4, produced from 1998 to 2006, represents a significant iteration of Ford’s globally successful compact pickup truck. This variant, positioned as a workhorse and all-terrain capable vehicle, was primarily sold in Europe and other international markets. It occupied a middle ground within the Ranger I lineup, offering a balance between affordability, practicality, and four-wheel-drive capability. The Super Cab configuration provided extended passenger space compared to the standard cab, making it suitable for both commercial and family use. This model played a crucial role in establishing the Ranger as a popular choice for those needing a versatile and durable pickup.
Technical Specifications
| Brand | Ford |
| Model | Ranger |
| Generation | Ranger I Super Cab |
| Type (Engine) | 2.5 TDCi (109 Hp) 4×4 |
| Start of production | 1998 |
| End of production | 2006 |
| Powertrain Architecture | Internal Combustion engine |
| Body type | Pick-up |
| Seats | 4 |
| Doors | 2 |
| Fuel Type | Diesel |
| Weight-to-power ratio | 12.8 kg/Hp |
| Hp/tonne | 77.9 Hp/tonne |
| Weight-to-torque ratio | 5.3 kg/Nm |
| Nm/tonne | 190.1 Nm/tonne |
| Power | 109 Hp @ 3500 rpm |
| Power per litre | 43.6 Hp/l |
| Torque | 266 Nm @ 2000 rpm (196.19 lb.-ft. @ 2000 rpm) |
| Engine layout | Front, Longitudinal |
| Engine Model/Code | WL-T |
| Engine displacement | 2499 cm3 (152.5 cu. in.) |
| Number of cylinders | 4 |
| Engine configuration | Inline |
| Cylinder Bore | 93 mm (3.66 in.) |
| Piston Stroke | 92 mm (3.62 in.) |
| Number of valves per cylinder | 3 |
| Fuel injection system | Diesel Commonrail |
| Engine aspiration | Turbocharger, Intercooler |
| Engine oil capacity | 6.3 l (6.66 US qt | 5.54 UK qt) |
| Coolant | 9.4 l (9.93 US qt | 8.27 UK qt) |
| Kerb Weight | 1399 kg (3084.27 lbs.) |
| Max. weight | 2087 kg (4601.05 lbs.) |
| Max load | 688 kg (1516.78 lbs.) |
| Fuel tank capacity | 70 l (18.49 US gal | 15.4 UK gal) |
| Length | 4998 mm (196.77 in.) |
| Width | 1695 mm (66.73 in.) |
| Height | 1740 mm (68.5 in.) |
| Wheelbase | 3000 mm (118.11 in.) |
| Front track | 1450 mm (57.09 in.) |
| Rear (Back) track | 1440 mm (56.69 in.) |
| Ride height (ground clearance) | 200 mm (7.87 in.) |
| Drive wheel | All wheel drive (4×4) |
| Number of gears and type of gearbox | 5 gears, manual transmission |
| Front suspension | Independent torsion bar, double wishbone |
| Rear suspension | Dependent suspension of two longitudinal semi-elliptic leaf springs |
| Front brakes | Ventilated discs |
| Rear brakes | Drum |
| Assisting systems | ABS (Anti-lock braking system) |
| Steering type | Steering rack and pinion |
| Tires size | 235/75 R15 |
| Wheel rims size | 15 |
Powertrain & Engine Architecture
The heart of the Ranger I Super Cab 2.5 TDCi 4×4 is the WL-T 2.5-liter inline-four diesel engine. This engine utilizes a common rail direct injection system, a significant advancement over earlier diesel designs. The common rail system allows for more precise fuel delivery, resulting in improved combustion efficiency, reduced noise, and increased power output. A turbocharger with an intercooler further enhances performance by forcing more air into the cylinders. The engine produces 109 horsepower at 3500 rpm and 266 Nm (196 lb-ft) of torque at 2000 rpm. The five-speed manual transmission was the standard offering for this variant, providing a balance between fuel economy and usability. The engine’s longitudinal mounting allowed for a traditional front-engine, rear-wheel-drive layout with a transfer case enabling four-wheel drive functionality.
Driving Characteristics
The 2.5 TDCi engine, paired with the five-speed manual transmission, delivered adequate, though not exhilarating, performance. Acceleration was modest, prioritizing torque for hauling and towing rather than outright speed. The gear ratios were tuned for practicality, offering a usable spread of power across a range of speeds. Compared to higher-output versions of the Ranger I, such as those equipped with larger gasoline engines, the 2.5 TDCi felt less responsive. However, it offered significantly better fuel economy and a more durable powertrain. The four-wheel-drive system provided enhanced traction in off-road conditions and on slippery surfaces, making it a capable work vehicle. The suspension, while functional, was tuned for load-carrying capacity rather than ride comfort.
Equipment & Trim Levels
The 2.5 TDCi 4×4 Super Cab typically came with a relatively basic level of equipment, reflecting its positioning as a work-oriented vehicle. Standard features generally included power steering, a basic audio system, and durable vinyl or cloth upholstery. The Super Cab configuration offered increased rear passenger space compared to the standard cab, though legroom remained limited. Optional extras included air conditioning, power windows, and upgraded audio systems. Trim levels varied depending on the market, but generally focused on adding cosmetic enhancements and convenience features rather than significant performance upgrades.
Chassis & Braking
The Ranger I Super Cab utilized a body-on-frame construction, providing a robust and durable chassis. The front suspension consisted of an independent torsion bar setup with double wishbones, offering reasonable ride quality and handling. The rear suspension employed a more traditional dependent leaf spring design, prioritizing load-carrying capacity. Braking duties were handled by ventilated discs at the front and drum brakes at the rear. Anti-lock Braking System (ABS) was often included as standard equipment, enhancing safety. The vehicle’s relatively high ground clearance of 200mm (7.87 inches) contributed to its off-road capability.
Market Reception & Comparison
The Ford Ranger I Super Cab 2.5 TDCi 4×4 was generally well-received in its target markets. Critics praised its durability, practicality, and fuel efficiency. However, some noted its relatively basic interior and modest performance compared to competitors. Compared to other Ranger I variants, the 2.5 TDCi offered a compelling balance between cost and capability. The gasoline-powered models provided more power but suffered from lower fuel economy. The higher-spec diesel variants offered more refinement but came at a higher price point. The 2.5 TDCi 4×4 appealed to buyers who prioritized reliability, fuel economy, and all-terrain capability over outright performance.
Legacy
The Ford Ranger I Super Cab 2.5 TDCi 4×4 has proven to be a relatively reliable and durable vehicle. The WL-T engine, while not without its quirks, is generally considered to be a robust and long-lasting unit. In the used car market, these Rangers are often sought after for their affordability and practicality. Maintenance is generally straightforward, and parts availability remains good. While not a collector’s item, the Ranger I 2.5 TDCi 4×4 continues to serve as a dependable workhorse for many owners, demonstrating the enduring appeal of Ford’s compact pickup truck.
