The Opel Crossland X 1.2 Turbo, producing 110 horsepower, was a key variant in the Crossland X range, manufactured between June 2018 and May 2019. Positioned as a mainstream offering within the lineup, it aimed to provide a balance of fuel efficiency, practicality, and affordability for European buyers. The Crossland X itself was a subcompact crossover SUV, developed as part of the PSA Group’s (later Stellantis) collaboration with Opel/Vauxhall. It shared its platform – the PF1 – with the Citroën C3 Aircross, representing Opel’s entry into the rapidly growing small SUV segment.
Technical Specifications
| Brand | Opel |
| Model | Crossland |
| Generation | Crossland X |
| Type (Engine) | 1.2 Turbo (110 Hp) |
| Start of production | June, 2018 |
| End of production | May, 2019 |
| Powertrain Architecture | Internal Combustion engine |
| Body type | SUV |
| Seats | 5 |
| Doors | 5 |
| Fuel consumption (urban) | 5.3-5.4 l/100 km (44.4 – 43.6 US mpg) |
| Fuel consumption (extra urban) | 4.3-4.4 l/100 km (54.7 – 53.5 US mpg) |
| Fuel consumption (combined) | 5 l/100 km (47 US mpg) |
| CO2 emissions | 108-109 g/km |
| Fuel Type | Petrol (Gasoline) |
| Acceleration 0 – 100 km/h | 10.9 sec |
| Acceleration 0 – 62 mph | 10.9 sec |
| Acceleration 0 – 60 mph | 10.4 sec |
| Maximum speed | 187 km/h (116.2 mph) |
| Emission standard | Euro 6d-Temp |
| Weight-to-power ratio | 10.6 kg/Hp |
| Weight-to-torque ratio | 5.7 kg/Nm |
| Power | 110 Hp @ 5500 rpm |
| Torque | 205 Nm @ 1750 rpm (151.2 lb.-ft. @ 1750 rpm) |
| Engine layout | Front, Transverse |
| Engine Model/Code | D12XHL |
| Engine displacement | 1199 cm3 (73.17 cu. in.) |
| Number of cylinders | 3 |
| Engine configuration | Inline |
| Cylinder Bore | 75 mm (2.95 in.) |
| Piston Stroke | 90.5 mm (3.56 in.) |
| Compression ratio | 10.5:1 |
| Number of valves per cylinder | 4 |
| Fuel injection system | Direct injection |
| Engine aspiration | Turbocharger, Intercooler |
| Engine oil capacity | 3.5 l (3.7 US qt | 3.08 UK qt) |
| Coolant | 5.7 l (6.02 US qt | 5.02 UK qt) |
| Kerb Weight | 1170 kg (2579.41 lbs.) |
| Max. weight | 1770 kg (3902.18 lbs.) |
| Max load | 600 kg (1322.77 lbs.) |
| Trunk (boot) space – minimum | 410 l (14.48 cu. ft.) |
| Trunk (boot) space – maximum | 1255 l (44.32 cu. ft.) |
| Fuel tank capacity | 45 l (11.89 US gal | 9.9 UK gal) |
| Max. roof load | 50 kg (110.23 lbs.) |
| Permitted trailer load with brakes (12%) | 840 kg (1851.88 lbs.) |
| Permitted trailer load without brakes | 600 kg (1322.77 lbs.) |
| Length | 4212 mm (165.83 in.) |
| Width | 1765 mm (69.49 in.) |
| Width including mirrors | 1976 mm (77.8 in.) |
| Height | 1605 mm (63.19 in.) |
| Wheelbase | 2604 mm (102.52 in.) |
| Front track | 1513 mm (59.57 in.) |
| Rear (Back) track | 1491 mm (58.7 in.) |
| Minimum turning circle | 11.2 m (36.75 ft.) |
| Drivetrain | Front wheel drive |
| Number of gears | 6 gears, manual transmission |
| Front brakes | Disc |
| Rear brakes | Disc |
| Tires size | 195/60 R16 |
| Wheel rims size | 6.5J x 16 |
Powertrain & Engine Architecture
The heart of the Crossland X 1.2 Turbo was the D12XHL engine, a 1.2-liter, three-cylinder turbocharged gasoline engine. This engine was part of Opel’s ‘Small Engine Family’ and featured direct fuel injection and a single-scroll turbocharger. The direct injection system, coupled with the turbocharger, allowed for a good balance of power and fuel efficiency. The engine produced 110 horsepower at 5500 rpm and 205 Nm (151.2 lb-ft) of torque at 1750 rpm. The engine’s relatively low displacement and three-cylinder configuration meant it benefited significantly from turbocharging to deliver adequate performance in a vehicle of this size. The engine was typically paired with a six-speed manual transmission, although an optional six-speed automatic transmission was also available. The automatic transmission was a conventional torque-converter type, prioritizing smooth shifts over outright performance.
Driving Characteristics
The 1.2 Turbo 110 hp variant of the Crossland X offered adequate, but not exhilarating, performance. Acceleration from 0-60 mph took around 10.4 seconds, and top speed was approximately 116 mph. The engine felt responsive enough for everyday driving, with the turbocharger providing a noticeable boost in power during acceleration. However, it could feel strained when fully loaded or when tackling steep inclines. The six-speed manual transmission offered precise shifts, while the automatic transmission provided a more relaxed driving experience, particularly in urban traffic. The gear ratios were tuned for fuel efficiency rather than outright performance, meaning the engine often needed to be revved to maintain speed on the highway. Compared to higher-powered versions of the Crossland X, this variant prioritized economy over sporty driving dynamics.
Equipment & Trim Levels
The 1.2 Turbo 110 hp Crossland X typically came with a reasonable level of standard equipment. This included air conditioning, a touchscreen infotainment system with Bluetooth connectivity, power windows, and central locking. Higher trim levels added features such as alloy wheels, a rear-view camera, parking sensors, and more advanced safety systems like automatic emergency braking. Interior upholstery was typically cloth, with options for leather upgrades on higher trims. The dashboard layout was functional and straightforward, with a focus on ease of use. Optional extras included a panoramic sunroof, heated seats, and a premium audio system.
Chassis & Braking
The Crossland X featured a front-wheel-drive chassis with MacPherson strut suspension at the front and a torsion beam suspension at the rear. The suspension setup was tuned for comfort, providing a relatively smooth ride over most road surfaces. The steering was light and easy to use, making it well-suited for urban driving. Braking was handled by disc brakes on all four wheels, with ABS (Anti-lock Braking System) as standard. The brakes provided adequate stopping power for everyday driving, but were not particularly sporty in feel.
Market Reception & Comparison
The Opel Crossland X 1.2 Turbo was generally well-received by critics as a practical and affordable small SUV. It was praised for its fuel efficiency, comfortable ride, and spacious interior. However, some reviewers criticized its lack of outright performance and its somewhat bland styling. Compared to other trims in the Crossland X lineup, the 1.2 Turbo offered the best fuel economy but the least amount of power. It was a popular choice for buyers who prioritized economy and practicality over sporty driving dynamics. Competitors in this segment included the Renault Captur, Peugeot 2008, and Nissan Juke.
Legacy
The D12XHL engine, while generally reliable, has been known to exhibit occasional issues with the timing chain, particularly in higher-mileage examples. Regular oil changes and maintenance are crucial for ensuring the longevity of this engine. The Crossland X itself has proven to be a relatively reliable vehicle overall, with few major reported issues. On the used car market, the 1.2 Turbo 110 hp variant represents a good value proposition for buyers seeking an affordable and fuel-efficient small SUV. Its practicality and reasonable running costs continue to make it a popular choice.
