2013-2015 Renault Kangoo II (facelift ) 1.5 dCi (75 Hp)

The Renault Kangoo II, particularly the facelifted version introduced in 2013, represented a significant evolution of Renault’s popular light commercial vehicle and passenger car blend. The 1.5 dCi 75 horsepower variant, produced from 2013 to 2015, occupied the entry-level position in the Kangoo II range, offering a practical and economical option for both commercial and family users. This version was primarily aimed at buyers prioritizing fuel efficiency and low running costs over outright performance. It played a key role in the Kangoo’s success in European markets, where compact vans and leisure activity vehicles were – and continue to be – in high demand.

Technical Specifications

Brand Renault
Model Kangoo
Generation Kangoo II (facelift 2013)
Type (Engine) 1.5 dCi (75 Hp)
Start of production 2013
End of production 2015
Powertrain Architecture Internal Combustion engine
Body type Minivan
Seats 5
Doors 5
Fuel consumption (urban) 5.2 l/100 km (45.2 US mpg, 54.3 UK mpg, 19.2 km/l)
Fuel consumption (extra urban) 4.2 l/100 km (56 US mpg, 67.3 UK mpg, 23.8 km/l)
Fuel consumption (combined) 4.6 l/100 km (51.1 US mpg, 61.4 UK mpg, 21.7 km/l)
CO2 emissions 119 g/km
Fuel Type Diesel
Acceleration 0 – 100 km/h 16.3 sec
Acceleration 0 – 62 mph 16.3 sec
Acceleration 0 – 60 mph 15.5 sec
Maximum speed 150 km/h (93.21 mph)
Emission standard Euro 4
Weight-to-power ratio 17.6 kg/Hp, 56.8 Hp/tonne
Weight-to-torque ratio 7.3 kg/Nm, 136.4 Nm/tonne
Power 75 Hp @ 4000 rpm
Power per litre 51.3 Hp/l
Torque 180 Nm @ 1750 rpm (132.76 lb.-ft. @ 1750 rpm)
Engine layout Front, Transverse
Engine Model/Code K9K
Engine displacement 1461 cm3 (89.16 cu. in.)
Number of cylinders 4
Engine configuration Inline
Number of valves per cylinder 2
Fuel injection system Diesel Commonrail
Engine aspiration Turbocharger, Intercooler
Engine oil capacity 4.5 l (4.76 US qt | 3.96 UK qt)
Coolant capacity 7.2 l (7.61 US qt | 6.34 UK qt)
Kerb Weight 1320 kg (2910.1 lbs)
Max. weight 1950 kg (4299.01 lbs)
Max load 630 kg (1388.91 lbs)
Trunk (boot) space – minimum 660 l (23.31 cu. ft.)
Trunk (boot) space – maximum 2600 l (91.82 cu. ft.)
Fuel tank capacity 60 l (15.85 US gal | 13.2 UK gal)
Permitted trailer load with brakes (12%) 1050 kg (2314.85 lbs)
Permitted trailer load without brakes 695 kg (1532.21 lbs)
Length 4282 mm (168.58 in)
Width 1829 mm (72.01 in)
Width including mirrors 2138 mm (84.17 in)
Height 1839 mm (72.4 in)
Wheelbase 2697 mm (106.18 in)
Front track 1521 mm (59.88 in)
Rear track 1533 mm (60.35 in)
Front overhang 875 mm (34.45 in)
Rear overhang 710 mm (27.95 in)
Ride height (ground clearance) 211-158 mm (8.31 – 6.22 in)
Minimum turning circle 10.7 m (35.1 ft)
Drivetrain Architecture Front wheel drive
Drive wheel Front wheel drive
Number of gears and type of gearbox 5 gears, manual transmission
Front suspension Independent type McPherson
Rear suspension Torsion
Front brakes Ventilated discs
Rear brakes Drum
Assisting systems ABS (Anti-lock braking system)
Steering type Steering rack and pinion
Power steering Electric Steering
Tires size 195/65 R15 91T
Wheel rims size 15

INTRODUCTION

The Renault Kangoo II, launched in 2008 and receiving a significant facelift in 2013, built upon the success of its predecessor, offering a versatile vehicle that blurred the lines between a commercial van and a family MPV. The 1.5 dCi 75 hp variant, produced between 2013 and 2015, was a key component of the Kangoo II lineup. It was designed to appeal to budget-conscious buyers and those who prioritized fuel economy. Based on the 1HX0/A3 platform, the Kangoo II offered a spacious interior, practical features, and a relatively comfortable ride, making it a popular choice in Europe.

Powertrain & Engine Architecture

The heart of the Kangoo II 1.5 dCi 75 hp is the K9K engine, a member of Renault’s widely used family of small-displacement diesel engines. This engine is a 1.5-liter inline-four cylinder unit featuring a turbocharger with an intercooler to enhance power and efficiency. The engine utilizes a diesel commonrail direct injection system, delivering fuel directly into the combustion chamber at high pressure for improved combustion and reduced emissions. The engine’s head features two valves per cylinder. The 75 horsepower output is achieved at 4000 rpm, while peak torque of 180 Nm (132.76 lb-ft) is available from 1750 rpm. This configuration prioritizes low-end torque for everyday drivability. The engine was typically paired with a five-speed manual transmission, although an automated manual transmission (Quickshift) was also available as an option.

Driving Characteristics

The 1.5 dCi 75 hp Kangoo II offers a utilitarian driving experience. Acceleration is modest, with a 0-100 km/h (0-62 mph) time of around 16.3 seconds. The focus is on fuel efficiency rather than outright speed. The engine provides adequate torque for everyday driving, making it suitable for urban commutes and light hauling. The five-speed manual transmission is well-matched to the engine’s characteristics, offering smooth gear changes. Compared to higher-powered versions of the Kangoo II, such as those with the 90 hp or 110 hp engines, the 75 hp variant feels noticeably slower, particularly when fully loaded or climbing hills. However, the lower power output contributes to improved fuel economy. The gear ratios are optimized for maximizing fuel efficiency and providing sufficient pulling power at lower speeds.

Equipment & Trim Levels

The 1.5 dCi 75 hp Kangoo II typically came with a relatively basic level of equipment, reflecting its position as the entry-level model. Standard features generally included power steering, central locking, electric front windows, and an adjustable steering column. Safety features such as ABS and driver/passenger airbags were also standard. Interior upholstery was typically cloth, and the dashboard featured a functional, if somewhat basic, design. Optional extras included air conditioning, a radio/CD player, rear parking sensors, and upgraded upholstery. Higher trim levels, such as the Expression or Dynamique, added more features as standard, but the 75 hp engine remained available on lower-spec models for those prioritizing affordability.

Chassis & Braking

The Kangoo II utilizes a McPherson strut independent suspension system at the front and a torsion beam suspension at the rear. This setup provides a reasonable balance between ride comfort and handling. The front brakes are ventilated discs, while the rear brakes are drums. This configuration is typical for vehicles in this weight class and price range. The steering is rack and pinion with electric power assistance, providing light and precise steering feel. The 15-inch wheels, typically fitted with 195/65 R15 tires, contribute to a comfortable ride quality. Stabilizer bars are fitted to both the front and rear axles to reduce body roll during cornering.

Market Reception & Comparison

The Renault Kangoo II 1.5 dCi 75 hp was generally well-received by critics as a practical and economical vehicle. It was praised for its spacious interior, fuel efficiency, and low running costs. However, some reviewers noted its lack of power, particularly when fully loaded. Compared to other trims in the Kangoo II lineup, the 75 hp variant offered the most affordable entry point but sacrificed performance. Against competitors like the Citroën Berlingo and Peugeot Partner, the Kangoo II 1.5 dCi 75 hp offered a competitive package in terms of price, fuel economy, and practicality. The Berlingo and Partner often offered similar engine options, and the choice often came down to personal preference and brand loyalty.

Legacy

The K9K engine, found in the Kangoo II 1.5 dCi 75 hp, has proven to be a relatively reliable unit, although regular maintenance is essential. Common issues include turbocharger wear and potential problems with the diesel particulate filter (DPF) on later models. In the used car market, the 1.5 dCi 75 hp Kangoo II represents a good value proposition for buyers seeking a practical and economical vehicle. Its simplicity and relatively low running costs make it an attractive option for those on a budget. While not the most exciting vehicle to drive, it remains a popular choice for small businesses, families, and individuals who prioritize functionality and affordability.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top