2006-2010 Vauxhall Antara 2.0 CDTi ECOTEC (150 Hp) 4×4 Automatic

The Vauxhall Antara 2.0 CDTi ECOTEC (150 hp) 4×4 Automatic, produced between 2006 and 2010, represented a key offering in Vauxhall’s foray into the compact SUV segment. Positioned as a mid-range trim within the Antara lineup, it aimed to provide a balance between fuel efficiency, all-weather capability, and comfortable practicality. The Antara itself was Vauxhall’s version of the Opel Antara, sharing its platform – the GM Theta – with vehicles like the Chevrolet Captiva. This model was primarily targeted at the European market, offering a more affordable and accessible SUV option compared to premium competitors.

Technical Specifications

Brand Vauxhall
Model Antara
Generation Antara
Type (Engine) 2.0 CDTi ECOTEC (150 Hp) 4×4 Automatic
Start of production 2006
End of production 2010
Powertrain Architecture Internal Combustion engine
Body type SUV
Seats 5
Doors 5
Fuel consumption (urban) 10.9 l/100 km (21.6 US mpg, 25.9 UK mpg, 9.2 km/l)
Fuel consumption (extra urban) 7.3 l/100 km (32.2 US mpg, 38.7 UK mpg, 13.7 km/l)
Fuel consumption (combined) 8.6 l/100 km (27.4 US mpg, 32.8 UK mpg, 11.6 km/l)
CO2 emissions 238 g/km
Fuel Type Diesel
Acceleration 0 – 100 km/h 12.1 sec
Acceleration 0 – 62 mph 12.1 sec
Acceleration 0 – 60 mph 11.5 sec
Maximum speed 178 km/h (110.6 mph)
Weight-to-power ratio 11.5 kg/Hp, 86.7 Hp/tonne
Weight-to-torque ratio 5.4 kg/Nm, 185 Nm/tonne
Power 150 Hp @ 5200 rpm
Power per litre 75.3 Hp/l
Torque 320 Nm @ 2000 rpm (236.02 lb.-ft. @ 2000 rpm)
Engine layout Front, Transverse
Engine Model/Code Z20DMH
Engine displacement 1991 cm3 (121.5 cu. in.)
Number of cylinders 4
Engine configuration Inline
Fuel injection system Diesel Commonrail
Engine aspiration Turbocharger, Intercooler
Valvetrain DOHC
Engine oil capacity 6.2 l (6.55 US qt | 5.46 UK qt)
Coolant 9 l (9.51 US qt | 7.92 UK qt)
Kerb Weight 1730-1790 kg (3814 – 3946.27 lbs.)
Trunk (boot) space – minimum 370 l (13.07 cu. ft.)
Trunk (boot) space – maximum 1420 l (50.15 cu. ft.)
Fuel tank capacity 65 l (17.17 US gal | 14.3 UK gal)
Permitted trailer load with brakes (12%) 1500-2000 kg (3306.93 – 4409.25 lbs.)
Length 4576 mm (180.16 in.)
Width 1850 mm (72.83 in.)
Width including mirrors 2085 mm (82.09 in.)
Height 1747 mm (68.78 in.)
Wheelbase 2707 mm (106.57 in.)
Front track 1572 mm (61.89 in.)
Rear (Back) track 1562 mm (61.5 in.)
Front overhang 926 mm (36.46 in.)
Rear overhang 943 mm (37.13 in.)
Ride height (ground clearance) 200 mm (7.87 in.)
Drag coefficient (Cd) 0.38
Minimum turning circle (turning diameter) 12.4 m (40.68 ft.)
Approach angle 24°
Departure angle 16°
Ramp-over (brakeover) angle 14°
Wading depth 450 mm (17.72 in.)
Drive wheel All wheel drive (4×4)
Number of gears and type of gearbox 5 gears, automatic transmission
Front suspension Independent type McPherson
Rear suspension Independent multi-link suspension
Front brakes Ventilated discs
Rear brakes Disc
Assisting systems ABS (Anti-lock braking system)
Tires size 235/60 R17; 235/55 R18
Wheel rims size 17; 18

Powertrain & Engine Architecture

The heart of the Antara 2.0 CDTi was the Z20DMH engine, a 2.0-liter four-cylinder diesel. This engine belonged to the GM/Fiat family of common rail direct injection diesels. It featured a turbocharger with an intercooler to boost power and efficiency. The engine utilized a double overhead camshaft (DOHC) valvetrain, optimizing gas flow for improved performance. The common rail diesel injection system, operating at very high pressures, allowed for precise fuel delivery and reduced emissions. The 5-speed automatic transmission was a conventional hydraulic automatic, chosen for its smoothness and ease of use, although it wasn’t known for being particularly sporty or fuel-efficient compared to manual alternatives.

Driving Characteristics

The 150 hp output and 320 Nm of torque provided adequate, but not exhilarating, performance. Acceleration from 0-60 mph took around 11.5 seconds, and top speed was approximately 110.6 mph. The automatic transmission, while comfortable, resulted in a noticeable difference in responsiveness compared to the manual versions. Gear changes were generally smooth, but could feel somewhat hesitant during quick overtaking maneuvers. The 4×4 system provided enhanced traction in slippery conditions, making it a capable all-weather vehicle. However, it wasn’t designed for serious off-roading. The power delivery was fairly linear, with peak torque available from 2000 rpm, making it suitable for everyday driving and towing.

Equipment & Trim Levels

The 2.0 CDTi ECOTEC Automatic typically came with a reasonable level of standard equipment. This included air conditioning, electric windows, central locking, and an audio system with CD player. Higher trim levels, often denoted by ‘SE’ or ‘Design’ badges, added features like alloy wheels, climate control, parking sensors, and upgraded interior trim. Interior upholstery was typically cloth, with leather options available as an extra. The dashboard layout was functional and straightforward, prioritizing usability over stylistic flair. Optional extras included a sunroof, navigation system, and heated seats.

Chassis & Braking

The Antara featured independent suspension all around – McPherson struts at the front and a multi-link setup at the rear – providing a comfortable ride quality. Stabilizer bars were fitted to both axles to reduce body roll during cornering. Braking was handled by ventilated discs at the front and solid discs at the rear, coupled with an Anti-lock Braking System (ABS). The suspension was tuned for comfort rather than outright handling prowess, prioritizing a smooth ride over sporty dynamics. The 4×4 system was typically an on-demand system, engaging the rear wheels when traction was lost at the front.

Market Reception & Comparison

The Antara 2.0 CDTi Automatic was generally well-received as a practical and affordable SUV. Critics praised its comfortable ride, spacious interior, and all-weather capability. However, the automatic transmission was often criticized for being somewhat sluggish and impacting fuel economy. Compared to the more powerful 2.4-liter petrol version, the 2.0 CDTi offered significantly better fuel economy and lower running costs, making it a more sensible choice for many buyers. Against competitors like the Nissan Qashqai and Kia Sportage, the Antara offered a competitive package, but often lacked the brand prestige of some rivals.

Legacy

The Z20DMH engine, while generally reliable, is known to require regular maintenance, particularly regarding the diesel particulate filter (DPF) and turbocharger. The automatic transmission, if not serviced regularly, can experience issues with harsh shifting. Today, the Antara 2.0 CDTi Automatic represents an affordable entry point into the SUV market. Well-maintained examples can still provide reliable transportation, but potential buyers should be aware of the potential maintenance costs associated with a diesel engine and automatic transmission of this age. Its lasting appeal lies in its practicality, affordability, and the added security of all-wheel drive.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top