1983-1987 Volkswagen Golf II (5-door) 1.6 (75 Hp)

The Volkswagen Golf Mk2, produced from 1983 to 1992, represented a significant evolution of the original Golf, offering increased size, improved aerodynamics, and a more refined driving experience. Within the Mk2 range, the 1.6-liter (75 hp) 5-door model occupied an important position as an entry-level offering, particularly in European markets. This variant aimed to provide affordable and practical transportation for families and commuters, balancing fuel efficiency with adequate performance for everyday driving. Production of this specific configuration ran from 1983 through 1987, bridging the gap between the initial Mk2 launch and later refinements.

Technical Specifications

Brand Volkswagen
Model Golf
Generation Golf II (5-door)
Type (Engine) 1.6 (75 Hp)
Start of production 1983
End of production 1987
Powertrain Architecture Internal Combustion engine
Body type Hatchback
Seats 5
Doors 5
Fuel consumption (urban) 8.7 l/100 km (27 US mpg, 32.5 UK mpg, 11.5 km/l)
Fuel consumption (extra urban) 5.8 l/100 km (40.6 US mpg, 48.7 UK mpg, 17.2 km/l)
Fuel Type Petrol (Gasoline)
Acceleration 0 – 100 km/h 13 sec
Acceleration 0 – 62 mph 13 sec
Acceleration 0 – 60 mph 12.4 sec
Maximum speed 167 km/h (103.77 mph)
Weight-to-power ratio 11.9 kg/Hp, 84.3 Hp/tonne
Weight-to-torque ratio 7.1 kg/Nm, 140.4 Nm/tonne
Power 75 Hp @ 5000 rpm
Power per litre 47 Hp/l
Torque 125 Nm @ 2500 rpm (92.2 lb.-ft. @ 2500 rpm)
Engine layout Front, Transverse
Engine Model/Code EZ
Engine displacement 1595 cm3 (97.33 cu. in.)
Number of cylinders 4
Engine configuration Inline
Cylinder Bore 81 mm (3.19 in.)
Piston Stroke 77.4 mm (3.05 in.)
Compression ratio 9:1
Number of valves per cylinder 2
Fuel injection system Carburettor
Engine aspiration Naturally aspirated engine
Valvetrain SOHC
Engine oil capacity 3 l (3.17 US qt | 2.64 UK qt)
Coolant capacity 6.5 l (6.87 US qt | 5.72 UK qt)
Kerb Weight 890 kg (1962.11 lbs.)
Max. weight 1400 kg (3086.47 lbs.)
Max load 510 kg (1124.36 lbs.)
Trunk (boot) space – minimum 345 l (12.18 cu. ft.)
Trunk (boot) space – maximum 1145 l (40.44 cu. ft.)
Fuel tank capacity 55 l (14.53 US gal | 12.1 UK gal)
Permitted trailer load with brakes (12%) 1000 kg (2204.62 lbs.)
Permitted trailer load without brakes 470 kg (1036.17 lbs.)
Length 3985 mm (156.89 in.)
Width 1665 mm (65.55 in.)
Height 1415 mm (55.71 in.)
Wheelbase 2475 mm (97.44 in.)
Front track 1427 mm (56.18 in.)
Rear (Back) track 1422 mm (55.98 in.)
Front overhang 810 mm (31.89 in.)
Rear overhang 700 mm (27.56 in.)
Drag coefficient (Cd) 0.34
Minimum turning circle 10.5 m (34.45 ft.)
Drivetrain Architecture The Internal combustion engine (ICE) drives the front wheels of the vehicle.
Drive wheel Front wheel drive
Number of gears and type of gearbox 4 gears, manual transmission
Front suspension Independent type McPherson
Rear suspension Elastic beam
Front brakes Disc
Rear brakes Drum
Steering type Steering rack and pinion
Tires size 175/70 R13
Wheel rims size 5.5J x 13

INTRODUCTION

The Volkswagen Golf Mk2 1.6 (75 hp) 5-door was a cornerstone of the model range, offering a practical and affordable entry point into Golf ownership. Introduced in 1983, it built upon the success of the original Golf by providing a more spacious and refined package. Positioned below the more powerful GTI and diesel variants, the 1.6-liter model catered to buyers prioritizing fuel economy and everyday usability. It was a common sight on European roads, serving as a reliable family car and commuter vehicle. The 5-door configuration added to its practicality, making it particularly appealing to families.

Powertrain & Engine Architecture

At the heart of this Golf variant lies the Volkswagen EZ engine, a 1.6-liter inline-four cylinder petrol engine. This engine, part of the EA827 family, utilized a single overhead camshaft (SOHC) valvetrain and two valves per cylinder. Crucially, this version employed a carburettor fuel injection system – a common feature for entry-level models of the era – rather than the more advanced fuel injection systems found in higher-spec Golfs. The carburettor, typically a Pierburg 2E2, provided adequate fuel delivery for the engine’s modest power output. The engine produced 75 horsepower at 5000 rpm and 125 Nm (92.2 lb-ft) of torque at 2500 rpm. The engine was transversely mounted, driving the front wheels. The transmission was a four-speed manual gearbox, chosen for its simplicity and cost-effectiveness. While an automatic transmission was available on some Mk2 Golfs, it was less common with the 1.6-liter engine.

Driving Characteristics

The 1.6-liter Golf Mk2 with a manual transmission offered a predictable, if not exhilarating, driving experience. Acceleration from 0 to 60 mph took around 12.4 seconds, and top speed was approximately 103.77 mph. The engine’s torque delivery was relatively flat, providing reasonable pulling power at lower revs, making it suitable for everyday driving. Compared to the GTI, which boasted significantly more power, the 1.6 felt noticeably slower, particularly during overtaking maneuvers. However, the 1.6’s lighter weight and simpler mechanicals contributed to a more nimble feel in city driving. The four-speed gearbox offered adequate spacing, but lacked the versatility of the five-speed transmissions found in higher-spec models. The gear ratios were optimized for fuel efficiency rather than outright performance.

Equipment & Trim Levels

The 1.6-liter Golf Mk2 was typically equipped with basic, yet functional, features. Standard equipment included cloth upholstery, a simple dashboard layout, and manual windows and door locks. Power steering and central locking were often optional extras. The interior was designed with practicality in mind, offering a comfortable and spacious cabin for five occupants. Trim levels were relatively limited, with most 1.6 models featuring a fairly uniform specification. Optional extras included a sunroof, upgraded stereo systems, and alloy wheels. The overall interior ambiance was functional and durable, reflecting the car’s focus on affordability and reliability.

Chassis & Braking

The Golf Mk2 1.6 utilized an independent McPherson strut suspension at the front, providing a comfortable ride and decent handling. The rear suspension employed a torsion beam setup, which was cost-effective and space-efficient. Braking was handled by disc brakes at the front and drum brakes at the rear. The braking system was adequate for the car’s weight and performance, but lacked the stopping power of the GTI’s larger brakes. Steering was via a rack and pinion system, offering precise and responsive control. The 1.6-liter model typically rode on 175/70 R13 tires, mounted on 5.5J x 13 steel wheels.

Market Reception & Comparison

The Golf Mk2 1.6 was generally well-received by critics as a practical and affordable family car. It was praised for its fuel efficiency, comfortable ride, and spacious interior. However, its relatively low power output was often cited as a drawback, particularly when compared to the GTI and diesel variants. The 1.6 offered a significant improvement in fuel economy over the GTI, making it a more economical choice for everyday commuting. Compared to the 1.9 TDI diesel, the 1.6 offered a smoother and quieter driving experience, but lacked the diesel’s superior fuel economy and low-end torque. The 1.6 was often seen as a sensible and reliable choice for buyers prioritizing practicality and affordability.

Legacy

The Volkswagen Golf Mk2 1.6 (75 hp) has proven to be a remarkably durable and reliable vehicle. Many examples are still on the road today, testament to the quality of its engineering and construction. The EZ engine, while not particularly powerful, is known for its longevity and relatively simple maintenance requirements. In the used car market, these Golfs are often sought after by enthusiasts and collectors, particularly those looking for a classic Volkswagen that is affordable to maintain. While not as highly prized as the GTI, the 1.6-liter model represents an important part of the Golf Mk2’s legacy, offering a practical and reliable alternative for buyers who prioritized affordability and fuel efficiency.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top